Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;5(8):702-704.
doi: 10.1002/cptc.202000287. Epub 2021 May 26.

Flavylium- and Silylrhodapolymethines In Excitation Multiplexing

Affiliations

Flavylium- and Silylrhodapolymethines In Excitation Multiplexing

Conghe Tian et al. ChemPhotoChem. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Creation of a flavylium polymethine dye set enabled selection of two fluorophores that match common lasers for exciting in the near-IR II region. Using these, researchers cast a broad net to catch any wavelength emission in the near-IR II region, and relied on selective excitation to multiplex; this is a paradigm shift away from multiplexing via discrimination of emission wavelengths. Excitation multiplexing with flavylium dyes is a new and exciting strategy, but not yet a perfect one; it requires discrete water soluble fluorophores, including one that is turned on at 808 nm.

Keywords: dyes and pigments; excitation multiplexing; flavylium; imaging; polymethine dye.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
a) Scheme showing an electromagnetic spectrum showing NIR—I and -II regions. b) Structure of Flav7 (top) and an absorption/emission maxima “map” showing the influence of introducing two dimethylamino substituents at identical places on each flavylium ring. (values shown are in dichloromethane)[3].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
a) Essentials of excitation-based multiplexing. b) Novel dyes developed to be excited at around 980 and 1064 nm. (values shown are in dichloromethane).[3]
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparison of silylrhodapentamethine and rhodapentamethine dyes (values shown are in dichloromethane).[4]

References

    1. Cosco ED, Caram JR, Bruns OT, Franke D, Day RA, Farr EP, Bawendi MG, Sletten EM, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 13126–13129; - PubMed
    2. Angew. Chem 2017, 129, 13306–13309.
    1. Pengshung M, Li J, Mukadum F, Lopez SA, Sletten EM, Org. Lett 2020, 22, 6150–6154. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cosco ED, Spearman AL, Ramakrishnan S, Lingg JGP, Saccomano M, Pengshung M, Arús BA, Wong KCY, Glasl S, Ntziachristos V, Warmer M, McLaughlin RR, Bruns OT, Sletten EM, Nat. Chem 2020, 12, 1123–1130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pengshung M, Neal P, Atallah TL, Kwon J, Caram JR, Lopez SA, Sletten EM, Chem. Commun 2020, 56, 6110–6113. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rurack K, Spieles M, Anal. Chem 2011, 83, 1232–1242. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources