Suggested robotic-assisted thoracic surgery training curriculum
- PMID: 36910116
- PMCID: PMC9992622
- DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-598
Suggested robotic-assisted thoracic surgery training curriculum
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery, a technological advancement in the field of surgery, has become increasingly popular among surgeons of many specialties over time. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is comparable to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in terms of patient care outcomes; however, the perception of increased operative time and a lack of cost-effectiveness have led to controversy regarding its alleged benefits. Nevertheless, robotic surgery is one of the preferred options for minimally invasive surgery by some thoracic surgeon over VATS, due to its ability to provide 3-D vision, precise wrist movements, enhanced magnification, and instrument stability and articulation. Notably, trainees in the field of thoracic surgery experience difficulty gaining knowledge and learning skills associated with RATS due to its complexity, limited access to robotic instruments, the lack of a standardized curriculum for trainees, and lack of mentorship or proctorship, thus leading to a steeper learning curve compared to laparoscopic or VATS procedures that are cost-friendly, easy to learn, and feasible to practice. Nevertheless, focusing on RATS training for thoracic surgeons will keep them familiar with robotic techniques, including the pre-operative setup and intra-operative process, which will ultimately decrease operative times. In this paper, we will review the literature, express and discuss the most viable training curriculum from authors' point of view to help achieve this goal.
Keywords: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS); robotic surgery training curriculum; robotic thoracic surgery training program.
2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-598/coif). GMW reports non-financial support from Device Technologies, personal fees from Device Technologies, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Medtronic, grants from Johnson & Johnson, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources