Efficacy and safety of canakinumab as a second line biologic after tocilizumab treatment failure in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A single-centre cohort study using routinely collected health data
- PMID: 36911042
- PMCID: PMC9992960
- DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1114207
Efficacy and safety of canakinumab as a second line biologic after tocilizumab treatment failure in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A single-centre cohort study using routinely collected health data
Abstract
Background: A significant number of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) patients discontinue biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) due to lack of efficacy or safety concerns. Studies of biologic therapy switch regimens in sJIA are required.
Methods: Patients with sJIA who switched from tocilizumab (due to lack of efficacy or safety) to canakinumab (4 mg/kg every 4 weeks) and were hospitalized at the rheumatology department from August 2012 to July 2020 were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were 30% or greater improvement based on the paediatric criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR30), achievement of inactive disease (JADAS-71 = 0) and clinical remission (ACR sJIA clinical inactive disease criteria). Follow-up from time first canakinumab dose administered was 12 months or the closest time point (not less than 6 and not more than 18 months). Data were extracted from electronic outpatient medical records.
Results: During the study period, 46 patients with sJIA switched from tocilizumab to canakinumab. Median age at baseline was 8.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.0-12.9] years, with the median sJIA duration being 1.8 (IQR 0.8-5.8) years; 37 (80%) patients received at least one conventional DMARD (cDMARD; oral corticosteroids, methotrexate and/or cyclosporine A). Study outcomes were followed up in 45 patients (one patient did not attend the follow-up for an unknown reason); median follow-up was 359 (IQR 282-404) days. During the follow-up, 1 patient discontinued canakinumab due to tuberculosis detection and the dose was reduced or the injection interval increased in 4 (9%) patients. In total, 27 (60%) patients continued to receive at least one cDMARD. Improvement according to the ACR30 criteria was achieved in 43 patients [96%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85-99], inactive disease in 42 (93%; 95%CI 82-98), and remission in 37 (82%; 95% CI 69-91); after adjustment for actual time-at-risk, the rates were 83, 85 and 73 events per 100 person-years, respectively. During follow-up, 23 AEs (most frequently infections) were reported in 19/45 (42%) patients; 5/45 (11%) patients developed macrophage activation syndrome, with a favorable outcome in all cases.
Conclusions: One-year canakinumab therapy was found to be potentially effective as second-line biologic therapy after discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with sJIA.
Keywords: canakinumab; second-line biologic; switching; systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis; tocilizumab.
© 2023 Alexeeva, Krekhova, Dvoryakovskaya, Isaeva, Chomakhidze, Chistyakova, Lomakina, Denisova, Mamutova, Fetisova, Gautier, Vankova, Kriulin and Saygitov.
Conflict of interest statement
Ekaterina Alexeeva has received grant/research support from Roche, Pfizer, Centocor, Eli Lilly, and Novartis, and has participated in Speakers bureau sessions for Roche, AbbVie, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers, Squibb, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. Tatyana Dvoryakovskaya has received grant/research support from Roche, Pfizer, Centocor, Eli Lilly, and Novartis, and has participated in Speakers bureau sessions for Roche, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers, Squibb, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. Ksenia Isaeva has received grant/research support from Roche, Novartis and Sanofi. Olga Lomakina has received grant/research support from Pfizer, Eli Lilly. Rina Denisova has received grant/research support from Roche, Pfizer, Centocor, Sanofi and Novartis, and has participated in Speakers bureau sessions for Roche, AbbVie, MSD, Novartis. Anna Mamutova has received grant/research support from Eli Lilly has participated in Speakers bureau sessions for Novartis. Anna Fetisova has received grant/research support from Amgen and AbbVie. Elizaveta Krekhova, Aleksandra Chomakhidze, Evgeniya Chistyakova, Marina Gautier, Dariya Vankova, Ivan Kriulin, and Ruslan Saygitov confirm that s(he) has no competing interests to declare.
References
-
- Otten MH, Prince FH, Anink J, Ten Cate R, Hoppenreijs EP, Armbrust W, et al. Effectiveness and safety of a second and third biological agent after failing etanercept in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the Dutch national ABC register. Ann Rheum Dis. (2013) 72(5):721–7. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201060 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Woerner A, Uettwiller F, Melki I, Mouy R, Wouters C, Bader-Meunier B, et al. Biological treatment in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: achievement of inactive disease or clinical remission on a first, second or third biological agent. RMD Open. (2015) 1(1):e000036. 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000036 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kearsley-Fleet L, Heaf E, Davies R, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Foster HE, et al. Frequency of biologic switching and the outcomes of switching in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a national cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. (2020) 2(4):e217–26. 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30025-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Alekseeva I, Lomakina ОL, Valieva SI, Bzarova ТМ, Nikishina IP, Zholobova Ye S, et al. Features of the drug therapy of children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: analysis results of the all-Russian register of the union of pediatricians of Russia. Voprosy Sovremennoi Pediatrii — Curr Pediatr. (2016) 15(1):59–67. 10.15690/vsp.v15i1.1500 - DOI
-
- Ringold S, Weiss PF, Beukelman T, DeWitt EM, Ilowite NT, Kimura Y, et al. American college of rheumatology. 2013 update of the 2011 American college of rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: recommendations for the medical therapy of children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and tuberculosis screening among children receiving biologic medications. Arthritis Rheum. (2013) 65(10):2499–512. 10.1002/art.38092 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
