Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 25;18(2):e1237.
doi: 10.1002/cl2.1237. eCollection 2022 Jun.

PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Olivia Magwood  1 , Alison Riddle  2 , Jennifer Petkovic  3 , Lyubov Lytvyn  4 , Joanne Khabsa  5 , Pearl Atwere  3 , Elie A Akl  6 , Pauline Campbell  7 , Vivian Welch  8 , Maureen Smith  9 , Reem A Mustafa  4 , Heather Limburg  10 , Leonila F Dans  11 , Nicole Skoetz  12 , Sean Grant  13 , Tom Concannon  14 , Peter Tugwell  15
Affiliations

PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Olivia Magwood et al. Campbell Syst Rev. .

Erratum in

  • CORRIGENDUM.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 1;18(2):e1248. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1248. eCollection 2022 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36913202 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: There is a need for the development of comprehensive, global, evidence-based guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development. Stakeholders are any individual or group who is responsible for or affected by health- and healthcare-related decisions. This includes patients, the public, providers of health care and policymakers for example. As part of the guidance development process, Multi-Stakeholder Engagement (MuSE) Consortium set out to conduct four concurrent systematic reviews to summarise the evidence on: (1) existing guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development, (2) barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in guideline development, (3) managing conflicts of interest in stakeholder engagement in guideline development and (4) measuring the impact of stakeholder engagement in guideline development. This protocol addresses the second systematic review in the series.

Objectives: The objective of this review is to identify and synthesise the existing evidence on barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development. We will address this objective through two research questions: (1) What are the barriers to multi-stakeholder engagement in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN-McMaster checklist? (2) What are the facilitators to multi-stakeholder engagement in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN-McMaster checklist?

Search methods: A comprehensive search strategy will be developed and peer-reviewed in consultation with a medical librarian. We will search the following databases: MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Sociological Abstracts. To identify grey literature, we will search the websites of agencies who actively engage stakeholder groups such as the AHRQ, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR), INVOLVE, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the PCORI. We will also search the websites of guideline-producing agencies, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, Australia's National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and the WHO. We will invite members of the team to suggest grey literature sources and we plan to broaden the search by soliciting suggestions via social media, such as Twitter.

Selection criteria: We will include empirical qualitative and mixed-method primary research studies which qualitatively report on the barriers or facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development. The population of interest is stakeholders in health guideline development. Building on previous work, we have identified 13 types of stakeholders whose input can enhance the relevance and uptake of guidelines: Patients, caregivers and patient advocates; Public; Providers of health care; Payers of health services; Payers of research; Policy makers; Program managers; Product makers; Purchasers; Principal investigators and their research teams; and Peer-review editors/publishers. Eligible studies must describe stakeholder engagement at any of the following steps of the GIN-McMaster Checklist for Guideline Development.

Data collection and analysis: All identified citations from electronic databases will be imported into Covidence software for screening and selection. Documents identified through our grey literature search will be managed and screened using an Excel spreadsheet. A two-part study selection process will be used for all identified citations: (1) a title and abstract review and (2) full-text review. At each stage, teams of two review authors will independently assess all potential studies in duplicate using a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data will be extracted by two review authors independently and in duplicate according to a standardised data extraction form.

Main results: The results of this review will be used to inform the development of guidance for multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation. This guidance will be official GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Working Group guidance. The GRADE system is internationally recognised as a standard for guideline development. The findings of this review will assist organisations who develop healthcare, public health and health policy guidelines, such as the World Health Organization, to involve multiple stakeholders in the guideline development process to ensure the development of relevant, high quality and transparent guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Logic model of the effects of stakeholder engagement in guideline development
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

  • Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review.
    Petkovic J, Riddle A, Lytvyn L, Khabsa J, Akl EA, Welch V, Magwood O, Atwere P, Graham ID, Grant S, John D, Katikireddi SV, Langlois EV, Mustafa RA, Todhunter-Brown A, Schünemann H, Stein AT, Concannon TW, Tugwell P. Petkovic J, et al. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 25;20(4):e70006. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70006. eCollection 2024 Dec. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39588485 Free PMC article.
  • The GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for engagement.
    Petkovic J, Magwood O, Concannon TW, Akl EA, Khabsa J, Lytvyn L, Welch V, Avey MT, Bhaumik S, Gunn A, Marusic A, Mbuagbaw L, Munn Z, Palm ME, Pollock D, Saginur M, Akl IB, Arayssi T, Ben Brahem A, Clifford T, Dormer L, Ekanem C, Greer-Smith R, Huzzey C, Kianzad B, Laine C, Lang E, Pottie K, Moja L, Morley R, Slingers N, Texeira L, Campbell P, Chang S, Dans LF, Guise JM, Katikireddi SV, Synnot A, Tufte J, Schünemann H, Tugwell P. Petkovic J, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May;181:111727. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111727. Epub 2025 Feb 17. J Clin Epidemiol. 2025. PMID: 39971165
  • Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR, Alston LV, Bolton KA, Whelan J, Reeve E, Wong Shee A, Browne J, Walker T, Versace VL, Allender S, Nichols M, Backholer K, Goodwin N, Lewis S, Dalton H, Prael G, Curtin M, Brooks R, Verdon S, Crockett J, Hodgins G, Walsh S, Lyle DM, Thompson SC, Browne LJ, Knight S, Pit SW, Jones M, Gillam MH, Leach MJ, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Muyambi K, Eshetie T, Tran K, May E, Lieschke G, Parker V, Smith A, Hayes C, Dunlop AJ, Rajappa H, White R, Oakley P, Holliday S. Osborne SR, et al. Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
  • The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
  • Comparing Methods to Make Research More Patient Centered [Internet].
    Wilkins C, Stallings SC, Villalta-Gil V, Houston M, Vaughn Y, Richmond A, Novak L, Joosten Y, Simpson C, Israel T, Boyd A, Hargreaves M, Murry VM, Boone L, Wallston K. Wilkins C, et al. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019 Dec. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019 Dec. PMID: 39312606 Free Books & Documents. Review.
See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
    1. Akl, E. A. , Welch, V. , Pottie, K. , Eslava‐Schmalbach, J. , Darzi, A. , Sola, I. , Katikireddi, S. V. , Singh, J. , Murad, M. H. , Meerpohl, J. , Stanev, R. , Lang, E. , Matovinovic, E. , Shea, B. , Agoritsas, T. , Alexander, P. E. , Snellman, A. , Brignardello‐Petersen, R. , Gloss, D. , … Tugwell, P. (2017). GRADE equity guidelines 2: Considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: Equity extension of the guideline development checklist. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 90, 68–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong, M. J. , Rueda, J. D. , Gronseth, G. S. , & Mullins, C. D. (2017). Framework for enhancing clinical practice guidelines through continuous patient engagement. Health Expectations, 20(1), 3–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkins, L. , Francis, J. , Islam, R. , O'Connor, D. , Patey, A. , Ivers, N. , Foy, R. , Duncan, E. M. , Colquhoun, H. , Grimshaw, J. M. , & Lawton, R. (2017). A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science, 12(1), 77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkins, L. , Smith, J. A. , Kelly, M. P. , & Michie, S. (2013). The process of developing evidence‐based guidance in medicine and public health: A qualitative study of views from the inside. Implementation Science, 8(1), 101. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources