Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 27;18(2):e1230.
doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230. eCollection 2022 Jun.

PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis

Affiliations

PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis

Neal R Haddaway et al. Campbell Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Reporting standards, such as PRISMA aim to ensure that the methods and results of systematic reviews are described in sufficient detail to allow full transparency. Flow diagrams in evidence syntheses allow the reader to rapidly understand the core procedures used in a review and examine the attrition of irrelevant records throughout the review process. Recent research suggests that use of flow diagrams in systematic reviews is poor and of low quality and called for standardised templates to facilitate better reporting in flow diagrams. The increasing options for interactivity provided by the Internet gives us an opportunity to support easy-to-use evidence synthesis tools, and here we report on the development of a tool for the production of PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review flow diagrams.

Methods and findings: We developed a free-to-use, Open Source R package and web-based Shiny app to allow users to design PRISMA flow diagrams for their own systematic reviews. Our tool allows users to produce standardised visualisations that transparently document the methods and results of a systematic review process in a variety of formats. In addition, we provide the opportunity to produce interactive, web-based flow diagrams (exported as HTML files), that allow readers to click on boxes of the diagram and navigate to further details on methods, results or data files. We provide an interactive example here; https://prisma-flowdiagram.github.io/.

Conclusions: We have developed a user-friendly tool for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams for users with coding experience and, importantly, for users without prior experience in coding by making use of Shiny (https://estech.shinyapps.io/prisma_flowdiagram/). This free-to-use tool will make it easier to produce clear and PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review flow diagrams. Significantly, users can also produce interactive flow diagrams for the first time, allowing readers of their reviews to smoothly and swiftly explore and navigate to further details of the methods and results of a review. We believe this tool will increase use of PRISMA flow diagrams, improve the compliance and quality of flow diagrams, and facilitate strong science communication of the methods and results of systematic reviews by making use of interactivity. We encourage the systematic review community to make use of the tool, and provide feedback to streamline and improve their usability and efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Matthew Page co‐led the development of the PRISMA 2020 statement and Luke McGuinness is a coauthor of the PRISMA 2020 statement, but they have no commercial interest in the use of this reporting guideline.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The full output plot from the PRISMA_flowdiagram() function
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of the PRISMA2020 Shiny app (a) landing page and (b) data entry and diagram visualisation page
Figure 3
Figure 3
The possible layouts that can be obtained via the 'previous studies' and 'other studies' arms checkboxes. (a) The full plot, (b) previous studies included, (c) databases and registers only, and (d) other studies included
Figure 4
Figure 4
Screenshot of the case study website, showing the PRISMA flow diagram (a) and the resulting page linked to by clicking on the database exclusions box (b)

References

    1. Beeley, C. (2013). Web application development with R using Shiny. Packt Publishing Ltd.
    1. Blank, G. , & Reisdorf, B. C. (2012). The participatory web: A user perspective on Web 2.0. Information, Communication & Society, 15(4), 537–554.
    1. Collaboration for Environmental Evidence . (2018). Guidelines and Standards for Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management: Version 5.0. Project Report.
    1. Dyck, M. , Robie, J. , Snelson, J. , & Chamberlin, D. (2014). XML path language (XPath) 3.1. W3C Working Draft.
    1. Elliott, J. H. , Synnot, A. , Turner, T. , Simmonds, M. , Akl, E. A. , McDonald, S. , Salanti, G. , Meerpohl, J. , MacLehose, H. , Hilton, J. , Tovey, D. , Shemilt, I. , Thomas, J. , & Living Systematic Review, N. (2017). Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—The why, what, when, and how. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 91, 23–30. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources