Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 22:10:1130566.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1130566. eCollection 2023.

Postoperative free flap monitoring in reconstructive surgery-man or machine?

Affiliations
Review

Postoperative free flap monitoring in reconstructive surgery-man or machine?

Samuel Knoedler et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Free tissue transfer is widely used for the reconstruction of complex tissue defects. The survival of free flaps depends on the patency and integrity of the microvascular anastomosis. Accordingly, the early detection of vascular comprise and prompt intervention are indispensable to increase flap survival rates. Such monitoring strategies are commonly integrated into the perioperative algorithm, with clinical examination still being considered the gold standard for routine free flap monitoring. Despite its widespread acceptance as state of the art, the clinical examination also has its pitfalls, such as the limited applicability in buried flaps and the risk of poor interrater agreement due to inconsistent flap (failure) appearances. To compensate for these shortcomings, a plethora of alternative monitoring tools have been proposed in recent years, each of them with inherent strengths and limitations. Given the ongoing demographic change, the number of older patients requiring free flap reconstruction, e.g., after cancer resection, is rising. Yet, age-related morphologic changes may complicate the free flap evaluation in elderly patients and delay the prompt detection of clinical signs of flap compromise. In this review, we provide an overview of currently available and employed methods for free flap monitoring, with a special focus on elderly patients and how senescence may impact standard free flap monitoring strategies.

Keywords: flap monitoring; free flap; free tissue transfer; microsurgery; microvascular reconstruction; reconstructive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustrative comparison between young and aging skin. Age-related skin changes can manifest in various ways, thereby complicating free flap evaluation and concealing common signs of free flap failure. Externally, deep wrinkles, dark-pigmented age spots, and superficial vascular drawings reflect the senescence of the skin structures. On the histological level, the dermo-epidermal junction flattens and the fibrillar-connective structure collapses. Due to a progressive subcutaneous fat reduction, decrease in water content, and loss of elasticity the impression of youthful smooth skin vanishes over time.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The current gold standard and novel techniques in the postoperative monitoring of free flaps. To date, the combination of clinical examination and acoustic Doppler sonography is still considered the state of art to monitor free flaps. More specifically, the attending physician examines the free flap serially evaluating the flap temperature, turgor, color, and capillary refill. Typically, this cornerstone of free flap assessment is supported by acoustic Doppler sonography as an instrument to sound the blood flow and velocity. Accordingly, the gold standard is based on a hands-on approach with the active-practical involvement of the physician at periodic intervals. In recent years, a broad spectrum of novel technologies has been proposed to facilitate and refine free flap monitoring. These high-tech methods range from the well-known color duplex sonography through implantable Doppler systems to hyperspectral and thermal imaging. In contrast to the conventional approach, this new generation of monitoring tools relies on digital (remote) equipment that allows the biophysical flap condition to be assessed in a technologically advanced and automatic-computerized form.

References

    1. Chao AH, Meyerson J, Povoski SP, Kocak E. A review of devices used in the monitoring of microvascular free tissue transfers. Expert Rev Med Devices. (2013) 10(5):649–60. 10.1586/17434440.2013.827527 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee M, Chin RY, Eslick GD, Sritharan N, Paramaesvaran S. Outcomes of microvascular free flap reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis: a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. (2015) 43(10):2026–33. 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauder A, Othman S, Asaad M, Butler CE, Kovach SJ. Microvascular free tissue transfer for reconstruction of Complex abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. (2022) 149(1):74e–8e. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008669 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiu YH, Chang DH, Perng CK. Vascular complications and free flap salvage in head and neck reconstructive surgery: analysis of 150 cases of reexploration. Ann Plast Surg. (2017) 78(3 Suppl 2):S83–s88. 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerrigan CL, Wizman P, Hjortdal VE, Sampalis J. Global flap ischemia: a comparison of arterial versus venous etiology. Plast Reconstr Surg. (1994) 93(7):1485–95, discussion 1496–7. 10.1097/00006534-199406000-00024 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources