Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 May 1;177(5):479-488.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0059.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Portable, Handheld Point-of-Care Tests vs Laboratory-Based Bilirubin Quantification in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Lauren E H Westenberg  1 , Jasper V Been  1   2   3 , Sten P Willemsen  2   4 , Jolande Y Vis  5 , Andrei N Tintu  5 , Wichor M Bramer  6 , Peter H Dijk  7 , Eric A P Steegers  2 , Irwin K M Reiss  1 , Christian V Hulzebos  7
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic Accuracy of Portable, Handheld Point-of-Care Tests vs Laboratory-Based Bilirubin Quantification in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Lauren E H Westenberg et al. JAMA Pediatr. .

Abstract

Importance: Quantification of bilirubin in blood is essential for early diagnosis and timely treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Handheld point-of-care (POC) devices may overcome the current issues with conventional laboratory-based bilirubin (LBB) quantification.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the reported diagnostic accuracy of POC devices compared with LBB quantification.

Data sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in 6 electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) up to December 5, 2022.

Study selection: Studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis if they had a prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, or cross-sectional design and reported on the comparison between POC device(s) and LBB quantification in neonates aged 0 to 28 days. Point-of-care devices needed the following characteristics: portable, handheld, and able to provide a result within 30 minutes. This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction was performed by 2 independent reviewers into a prespecified, customized form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed of multiple Bland-Altman studies using the Tipton and Shuster method for the main outcome.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was mean difference and limits of agreement in bilirubin levels between POC device and LBB quantification. Secondary outcomes were (1) turnaround time (TAT), (2) blood volumes, and (3) percentage of failed quantifications.

Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria (9 cross-sectional studies and 1 prospective cohort study), representing 3122 neonates. Three studies were considered to have a high risk of bias. The Bilistick was evaluated as the index test in 8 studies and the BiliSpec in 2. A total of 3122 paired measurements showed a pooled mean difference in total bilirubin levels of -14 μmol/L, with pooled 95% CBs of -106 to 78 μmol/L. For the Bilistick, the pooled mean difference was -17 μmol/L (95% CBs, -114 to 80 μmol/L). Point-of-care devices were faster in returning results compared with LBB quantification, whereas blood volume needed was less. The Bilistick was more likely to have a failed quantification compared with LBB.

Conclusions and relevance: Despite the advantages that handheld POC devices offer, these findings suggest that the imprecision for measurement of neonatal bilirubin needs improvement to tailor neonatal jaundice management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 Flow Diagram, Including Searches of Databases, Registers, and Other Sources
POC indicates point-of-care.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 Diagram
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Forest Plots of Pooled Mean Difference (Bias), Limits of Agreement (LOAs), and Outer Confidence Bounds (CBs)
aEstimates from Egypt. bEstimates from Indonesia. cEstimates from Nigeria. dEstimates from Vietnam.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bhutani VK, Zipursky A, Blencowe H, et al. . Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and Rhesus disease of the newborn: incidence and impairment estimates for 2010 at regional and global levels. Pediatr Res. 2013;74(suppl 1):86-100. doi:10.1038/pr.2013.208 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le Pichon JB, Riordan SM, Watchko J, Shapiro SM. The neurological sequelae of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: definitions, diagnosis and treatment of the kernicterus spectrum disorders (KSDs). Curr Pediatr Rev. 2017;13(3):199-209. doi:10.2174/1573396313666170815100214 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson L, Bhutani VK. The clinical syndrome of bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35(3):101-113. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2011.02.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greco C, Arnolda G, Boo NY, et al. . Neonatal jaundice in low- and middle-income countries: lessons and future directions from the 2015 Don Ostrow Trieste Yellow Retreat. Neonatology. 2016;110(3):172-180. doi:10.1159/000445708 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olusanya BO, Ogunlesi TA, Slusher TM. Why is kernicterus still a major cause of death and disability in low-income and middle-income countries? Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(12):1117-1121. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-305506 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types