Gender parity perspectives in Asia Pacific: a descriptive analysis of Philippine rheumatology conferences
- PMID: 36912939
- DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05303-8
Gender parity perspectives in Asia Pacific: a descriptive analysis of Philippine rheumatology conferences
Abstract
Gender parity at conferences can facilitate progress in academia towards the attainment of gender equality as emphasized in the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. The Philippines is a low to middle-income country in the Asia Pacific with relatively egalitarian gender norms experiencing significant growth in rheumatology. We examined the Philippines as a case study to analyze the impact of divergent gender norms on gender equity in rheumatology conference participation. We used publicly available data from PRA conference materials from 2009 to 2021. Gender was identified from information provided by organizers, online science directory networks, and a name-to-gender inference platform, the Gender application program interface (API). International speakers were identified separately. The results were then compared to other rheumatology conferences around the world. The PRA had 47% female faculty. Women were more likely to be the first authors in abstracts at the PRA (68%). There were more females among new inductees in PRA with the male: female ratio (M:F) of 1:3. The gender gap among new members declined from 5:1 to 2.7:1 from 2010 to 2015. However, low female representation was observed among international faculty (16%). Gender parity at the PRA was found to be considerably better when compared to other rheumatology conferences in the USA, Mexico, India, and Europe. However, a wide gender gap persisted among international speakers. Cultural and social constructs may potentially contribute to gender equity in academic conferences. Further research is recommended to assess the impact of gender norms on gender parity in academia in other Asia-Pacific countries.
Keywords: Conferences; Equity; Gender; Medical education; Rheumatology.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Heilman ME (2012) Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res Org Behav 32:113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003 - DOI
-
- Poggio B (2006) Editorial: outline of a theory of gender practices. Gend Work Organ 13(3):225–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2006.00305x - DOI
-
- Godman M (2018) Gender as a historical kind: a tale of two genders? Biol Philos 33(3):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9619-1 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Messing K, MagerStellman J (2006) Sex, gender and women’s occupational health: the importance of considering mechanism. Environ Res 101(2):149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.03.015 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Connell R (2012) Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Soc Sci Med 74(11):1675–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
