Long-term results of hyperopic ablations using alcohol-assisted PRK and FS-LASIK: comparative study
- PMID: 36913543
- DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001183
Long-term results of hyperopic ablations using alcohol-assisted PRK and FS-LASIK: comparative study
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term visual and refractive outcomes of hyperopic excimer ablation using alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).
Setting: American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Design: Retrospective, matched comparative study.
Methods: Eyes that underwent alcohol-assisted PRK were compared to matched eyes that underwent FS-LASIK. All patients were followed up for at least 3 years after surgery. The refractive and visual outcomes of each group were compared at different postoperative time points. The main outcome measures were spherical equivalent deviation from target (SEDT), manifest refraction, and visual acuity.
Results: 83 eyes underwent alcohol-assisted PRK and 83 matched eyes underwent FS-LASIK. Preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent was 2.44 ± 1.18 diopters (D) and 2.20 ± 0.87 D ( P = .133) in the PRK and FS-LASIK groups, respectively. Preoperative manifest cylinder was -0.77 ± 0.89 D and -0.61 ± 0.59 D ( P = .175) for the PRK and LASIK groups, respectively. 3 years postoperatively, SEDT was 0.28 ± 0.66 D and 0.40 ± 0.56 D for the PRK and LASIK groups, respectively ( P = .222), whereas manifest cylinder was -0.55 ± 0.49 D and -0.30 ± 0.34 D for PRK and LASIK, respectively ( P < .001). The mean difference vector was 0.59 ± 0.46 for PRK and 0.38 ± 0.32 for LASIK ( P < .001). 13.3% of PRK eyes and 0% of LASIK eyes had >1 D of manifest cylinder ( P = .003).
Conclusions: Both alcohol-assisted PRK and FS-LASIK are safe and effective for the treatment of hyperopia. PRK induces slightly more postoperative astigmatism than LASIK. Larger optical zones and recently introduced ablation profiles that lead to a smoother ablation surface might improve the clinical results of hyperopic PRK.
Copyright © 2023 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
References
-
- Cobo-Soriano R, Llovet F, González-López F, Domingo B, Gómez-Sanz F, Baviera J. Factors that influence outcomes of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1530–1538
-
- Zaldivar R, Oscherow S, Bains HS. Five techniques for improving outcomes of hyperopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 2005;21(5 suppl):628–633
-
- Dupps WJ, Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res 2006;83:709-720
-
- Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness after hyperopic LASIK: three-dimensional display with artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg 2010;26:555–564
-
- Wagh VK, Dave R, O'Brart DPS, Lim WS, Patel P, Tam C, Lee J, Marshall J. Eighteen-year follow-up of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016;42:258–266
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
