Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements
- PMID: 36914239
- PMCID: PMC11347197
- DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003748
Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements
Abstract
Pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences embrace a series of different disciplines. Pharmacy practice has been defined as 'the scientific discipline that studies the different aspects of the practice of pharmacy and its impact on healthcare systems, medicine use, and patient care'. Thus, pharmacy practice studies embrace both clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy elements. Like any other scientific discipline, clinical and social pharmacy practice disseminates research findings using scientific journals. Clinical pharmacy and social pharmacy journal editors have a role in promoting the discipline by enhancing the quality of the articles published. As has occurred in other healthcare areas (ie, medicine and nursing), a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors gathered in Granada, Spain to discuss how journals could contribute to strengthening pharmacy practice as a discipline. The result of that meeting was compiled in these Granada Statements, which comprise 18 recommendations gathered into six topics: the appropriate use of terminology, impactful abstracts, the required peer reviews, journal scattering, more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance metrics, and authors' selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work.
© European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
- 
  
  The Granada Statements: An opportunity for the hospital pharmacist to make more impact in the publication world, part 2.Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Nov;30(6):309. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003858. Epub 2023 Jun 30. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023. PMID: 37399272 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
- 
    - McGillivray B, Jenset GB, Salama K, et al. Investigating patterns of change, stability, and interaction among scientific disciplines using embeddings. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 2022;9:285. 10.1057/s41599-022-01267-5 - DOI
 
- 
    - Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. J Appl Psychol 1973;57:195–203. 10.1037/h0034701 - DOI
 
- 
    - Becher T. Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Stud High Educ 1981;6:109–22. 10.1080/03075078112331379362 - DOI
 
- 
    - Lodahl JB, Gordon G. The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. Am Sociol Rev 1972;37:57. 10.2307/2093493 - DOI
 
- 
    - Perry RP, Smart JC. The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence-based perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media, 2007. 10.1007/1-4020-5742-3 - DOI
 
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Research Materials
 
        