Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr;33(2):125-138.
doi: 10.1002/cbm.2284. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

Correctional treatment as an economically sound approach to reducing the high costs of recidivism: A review of the research

Steven N Zane  1 , Jhon A Pupo  1 , Brandon C Welsh  2   3
Affiliations
Review

Correctional treatment as an economically sound approach to reducing the high costs of recidivism: A review of the research

Steven N Zane et al. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Prior research indicates that correctional treatment programmes can be highly effective in reducing reoffending. Less studied, however, is whether such programmes are economically efficient.

Aims: To review the research literature on the economic efficiency of correctional treatment programmes.

Methods: A review of cost-benefit analyses of correctional treatment programmes from 2004 to the present was carried out. To be included in the review, studies must have attempted to measure monetary costs and benefits of correctional treatment programmes and be based on experimental or quasi-experimental evaluations.

Results: A total of 22 cost-benefit studies of correctional treatment programmes met the criteria for inclusion in the review, 19 of which estimated (or allowed estimation of) benefit-to-cost ratios. All 19 studies yielded a favourable benefit-to-cost ratio.

Conclusions: Correctional treatment programmes appear to be economically efficient, with the monetary benefits produced by such programmes substantially exceeding their monetary costs. This finding appears to hold across a variety of different intervention types, and offers policy-makers and practitioners ample evidence in favour of providing additional resources for correctional treatment programmes.

Keywords: correctional treatment; cost-benefit analysis; offender re-entry; recidivism; rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aos, S. (2004). Washington State’s Family Integrated Transitions Program for juvenile offenders: Outcome evaluation and benefit-cost analysis. Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
    1. Bierie, D. (2009). Cost matters: A randomized experiment comparing recidivism between two styles of prisons. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(4), 371-397.
    1. Borduin, C. M., & Dopp, A. R. (2015). Economic impact of multisystemic therapy with juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(5), 687-696.
    1. Caldwell, M. F., Vitacco, M., & Van Rybroek, G. J. (2006). Are violent delinquents worth treating? A cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(2), 148-168.
    1. Cheesman, F. L., Kunkel, T. L., Graves, S. E., Holt, J., Jones, T. J., & Lee, C. G. (2012). Virginia adult drug treatment courts: Cost benefit analysis. National Center for State Courts.

LinkOut - more resources