Shifting the narrative and practice of assessing professionalism in dietetics education: An Australasian qualitative study
- PMID: 36916155
- DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12804
Shifting the narrative and practice of assessing professionalism in dietetics education: An Australasian qualitative study
Abstract
Aim: We aimed to explore current approaches to assessing professionalism in dietetics education in Australia and New Zealand, and asked the questions what is working well and what needs to improve?
Method: We employed a qualitative interpretive approach and conducted interviews with academic and practitioner (workplace-based) educators (total sample n = 78) with a key stake in dietetics education across Australia and New Zealand. Data were analysed using team-based, framework analysis.
Results: Our findings suggest significant shifts in dietetics education in the area of professionalism assessment. Professionalism assessment is embedded in formal curricula of dietetics programs and is occurring in university and placement settings. In particular, advances have been demonstrated in those programs assessing professionalism as part of the programmatic assessment. Progress has been enabled by philosophical and curricula shifts; clearer articulation and shared understandings of professionalism standards; enhanced learner agency and reduced power distance; early identification and intervention of professionalism lapses; and increased confidence and capabilities of educators.
Conclusions: These findings suggest there have been considerable advances in professionalism assessment in recent years with shifts in practice in approaching professionalism through a more interpretivist lens, holistically and more student-centred. Professionalism assessment in dietetics education is a shared responsibility and requires further development and transformation to more fully embed and strengthen curricula approaches across programs. Further work should investigate strategies to build safer learning cultures and capacity for professionalism conversations and in strengthening approaches to remediation.
Keywords: assessment; curriculum; dietetics; education; health professions; professionalism.
© 2023 The Authors. Nutrition & Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Dietitians Australia.
Comment in
-
Is individual competency enough? Challenges for the dietetics profession to be leaders in nutrition.Nutr Diet. 2023 Jun;80(3):236-239. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12817. Nutr Diet. 2023. PMID: 37263630 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Dietitians Australia. National Competency Standards for Dietitians in Australia. Dietitians Australia; 2021.
-
- New Zealand Dietitians Board. Professional Standards and Competencies for Dietitians of New Zealand. New Zealand Dietitians Board; 2017.
-
- Palermo C, Capra S, Ash S, Beck E, Truby H, Jolly B. Professional Competence Standards, Learning Outcomes and Assessment: Designing a Valid Strategy for Nutrition and Dietetics. Office for Learning and Teaching, Australian Government; 2014.
-
- Wilkinson TJ, Wade WB, Knock LD. A blueprint to assess professionalism: results of a systematic review. Acad Med. 2009;81:551-558.
-
- Monrouxe L, Rees C. Healthcare Professionalism: Improving Practice through Reflections on Workplace Dilemmas. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2017:1-259.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
