Therapeutics for treating mpox in humans
- PMID: 36916727
- PMCID: PMC10012405
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015769
Therapeutics for treating mpox in humans
Abstract
Background: Mpox was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 23 July 2022, following the identification of thousands of cases in several non-endemic countries in previous months. There are currently no licenced therapeutics for treating mpox; however, some medications may be authorized for use in an outbreak. The efficacy and safety of possible therapeutic options has not been studied in humans with mpox. There is a need to investigate the evidence on safety and effectiveness of treatments for mpox in humans; should any therapeutic option be efficacious and safe, it may be approved for use around the world.
Objectives: There are two parts to this Cochrane Review: a review of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and a narrative review of safety data from non-randomized studies. Randomized controlled trials review To systematically review the existing evidence on the effectiveness of therapeutics for mpox infection in humans compared to: a) another different therapeutic for mpox, or b) placebo, or c) supportive care, defined as the treatment of physical and psychological symptoms arising from the disease. Non-randomized studies review To assess the safety of therapeutics for mpox infection from non-randomized studies (NRS).
Search methods: Randomized controlled trials review We searched the following databases up to 25 January 2023: MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (OVID), Biosis previews (Web of Science), CAB Abstracts (Web of science), and Cochrane CENTRAL (Issue 1 2023). We conducted a search of trial registries (Clinicaltrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)) on 25 January 2023. There were no date or language limits placed on the search. We undertook a call to experts in the field for relevant studies or ongoing trials to be considered for inclusion in the review. Non-randomized studies review We searched the following databases on 22 September 2022: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Issue 9 of 12, 2022), published in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid); Embase (Ovid); and Scopus (Elsevier). We also searched the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov for trials in progress.
Selection criteria: For the RCT review and the narrative review, any therapeutic for the treatment of mpox in humans was eligible for inclusion, including tecovirimat, brincidofovir, cidofovir, NIOCH-14, immunomodulators, and vaccine immune globulin. Randomized controlled trials review Studies were eligible for the main review if they were of randomized controlled design and investigated the effectiveness or safety of therapeutics in human mpox infection. Non-randomized studies review Studies were eligible for inclusion in the review of non-randomized studies if they were of non-randomized design and contained data concerning the safety of any therapeutic in human mpox infection.
Data collection and analysis: Randomized controlled trials review Two review authors independently applied study inclusion criteria to identify eligible studies. If we had identified any eligible studies, we planned to assess the risk of bias, and report results with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The critical outcomes were serious adverse events, development of disease-related complications, admission to hospital for non-hospitalized participants, pain as judged by any visual or numerical pain scale, level of virus detected in clinical samples, time to healing of all skin lesions, and mortality. We planned to perform subgroup analysis to explore whether the effect of the therapeutic on the planned outcomes was modified by disease severity and days from symptom onset to therapeutic administration. We also intended to explore the following subgroups of absolute effects: immunosuppression, age, and pre-existing skin disease. Non-randomized studies review One review author applied study inclusion criteria to identify eligible studies and extracted data. Studies of a non-randomized design containing data on the safety of therapeutics could not be meta-analyzed due to the absence of a comparator; we summarized these data narratively in an appendix.
Main results: Randomized controlled trials review We did not identify any completed RCTs investigating the effectiveness of therapeutics for treating mpox for the main review. We identified five ongoing trials that plan to assess the effectiveness of one therapeutic option, tecovirimat, for treating mpox in adults and children. One of these ongoing trials intends to include populations with, or at greater risk of, severe disease, which will allow an assessment of safety in more vulnerable populations. Non-randomized studies review Three non-randomized studies met the inclusion criteria for the narrative review, concerning data on the safety of therapeutics in mpox. Very low-certainty evidence from non-randomized studies of small numbers of people indicates no serious safety signals emerging for the use of tecovirimat in people with mpox infection, but a possible safety signal for brincidofovir. All three participants who received brincidofovir had raised alanine aminotransferase (ALT), but not bilirubin, suggesting mild liver injury. No study reported severe drug-induced liver injury with brincidofovir.
Authors' conclusions: Randomized controlled trials review This review found no evidence from randomized controlled trials concerning the efficacy and safety of therapeutics in humans with mpox. Non-randomized studies review Very low-certainty evidence from non-randomized studies indicates no serious safety signals emerging for the use of tecovirimat in people with mpox infection. In contrast, very low-certainty evidence raises a safety signal that brincidofovir may cause liver injury. This is also suggested by indirect evidence from brincidofovir use in smallpox. This warrants further investigation and monitoring. This Cochrane Review will be updated as new evidence becomes available to assist policymakers, health professionals, and consumers in making appropriate decisions for the treatment of mpox.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
Conflict of interest statement
TF is a Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group (CIDG) Research Associate, and was not involved in the editorial process. She has no known conflicts of interest to declare.
SG is a co‐author on one included study in this review. SG was not involved in any inclusion decisions, data extraction, or risk of bias assessment for this study.
NP has no known conflicts of interest to declare.
TR has no known conflicts of interest to declare.
VL is the CIDG Information Specialist, and was not involved in the editorial process. She has no known conflicts of interest to declare.
RK is a CIDG Research Associate, and was not involved in the editorial process. She has no known conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
References to studies excluded from this review
ISRCTN43307947 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN43307947. Expanded access protocol for the use of tecovirimat for the treatment of monkeypox infection. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN43307947 (first received 4 June 2021).
jRCTs031220169 {published data only}
-
- jRCTs031220169. A multicenter, open-label, double-arm trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral tecovirimat therapy for patients with smallpox or monkeypox. rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/detail?trial_id=jRCTs031220169 (first received 28 June 2022).
References to ongoing studies
ISRCTN17461766 {published data only}
-
- ISRCTN17461766. Antiviral treatment with tecovirimat for patients managed at home with monkeypox (PLATINUM) [Placebo-controlled randomised trial of tecovirimat in non-hospitalised monkeypox patients (PLATINUM)]. isrctn.com/ISRCTN17461766 (first received 17 August 2022).
NCT05534165 {published data only}
-
- NCT05534165. Tecovirimat in non-hospitalized patients with monkeypox (PLATINUM-CAN) [Placebo-controlled randomized trial of tecovirimat in non-hospitalized patients with monkeypox: Canadian feasibility study (PLATINUM-CAN)]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05534165 (first received 9 September 2022).
NCT05534984 {published data only}
-
- NCT05534984. Study of tecovirimat for human monkeypox virus (STOMP) [A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of the safety and efficacy of tecovirimat for the treatment of human monkeypox virus disease]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05534984 (first received 10 September 2022).
NCT05559099 {published data only}
-
- NCT05559099. Tecovirimat for treatment of monkeypox virus (PALM 007) [A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of the safety and efficacy of tecovirimat for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with monkeypox virus disease]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05559099 (first received 29 September 2022).
NCT05597735 {published data only}
-
- NCT05597735. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tecovirimat in patients with monkeypox virus disease (UNITY) [A Phase III, multi-country, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial to assess the efficacy and safety of tecovirimat antiviral treatment for patients with monkeypox virus disease]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05597735 (first received 28 October 2022).
Additional references
Adler 2022
Ahmed 2022
Aithal 2011
-
- Aithal GP, Watkins PB, Andrade RJ, Larrey D, Molokhia M, Takikawa H, et al. Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2011;89(6):806-15. - PubMed
Americo 2022
-
- Americo J, Earl P, Moss B. Virulence differences of monkeypox virus clades 1, 2a and 2b.1 in a small animal model. bioRxiv 2022;Preprint:12.01.518711. [DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.01.518711] - DOI
Andrei 2010
Beer 2019
Cangene 2010
-
- Cangene. Highlights of prescribing information Vaccinia Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human). www.fda.gov/media/77004/download (accessed 14 December 2022).
CDC 2022a
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Monkeypox outbreak global map. www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/world-map.html (accessed 15 December 2022).
CDC 2022b
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Treatment information for healthcare professionals. Updated 31 October 2022. Interim clinical guidance for the treatment of monkeypox. www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/clinicians/treatment.html (accessed 27 January 2023).
CDC 2023a
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Science brief: detection and transmission of mpox (formerly monkeypox) virus during the 2022 Clade IIb outbreak. www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/about/science-behind-transmission (accessed 9 February 2023).
CDC 2023b
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinician FAQs. www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/clinicians/faq.html (accessed 6 February 2023).
Chimerix 2022
-
- Chimerix. TEMBEXA Highlights of prescribing information. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/214460s000,214461s000l... (accessed 2 November 2022).
Cochrane 2022
-
- Cochrane. Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool. www.riskofbias.info/welcome/rob-2-0-tool/current-version-of-rob-2 (accessed 6 December 2022).
De Clerq 2002
EASL 2019
-
- European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: drug-induced liver injury. Journal of Hepatology 2019;70(6):1222-61. - PubMed
Falendysz 2017
Foster 2017
Frenois‐Veyrat 2022
-
- Frenois-Veyrat G, Gallardo F, Gorgé O, Marcheteau E, Ferraris O, Baidaliuk A, et al. Tecovirimat is highly efficient on the Monkeypox virus lineage responsible for the international 2022 outbreak. bioRxiv 2022;Pre-print:07.19.500484. [DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.19.500484] - DOI
Garner 2016
Girometti 2022
-
- Girometti N, Byrne R, Bracchi M, Heskin J, McOwan A, Tittle V, et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics of confirmed human monkeypox virus cases in individuals attending a sexual health centre in London, UK: an observational analysis. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2022;22(9):1321-8. - PMC - PubMed
Grosenbach 2018
Grossi 2017
-
- Grossi IM, Foster SA, Gainey MR, Krile RT, Dunn JA, Brundage T, et al. Efficacy of delayed brincidofovir treatment against a lethal rabbitpox virus challenge in New Zealand white rabbits. Antiviral Research 2017;143:278-86. - PubMed
Higgins 2022
-
- Higgins JP, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JA. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Hoy 2018
-
- Hoy S. Tecovirimat: first global approval. Drugs 2018;78(13):1377-82. - PubMed
Hutson 2021
Jordan 2009
Kern 2003
Kuroda 2023
LiverTox 2022
-
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. LiverTox: clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury. Available from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK585270/. - PubMed
Mazurkov 2016
-
- Mazurkov OY, Kabanov AS, Shishkina LN, Sergeev AA, Skarnovich MO, Bormotov NI, et al. New effective chemically synthesized anti-smallpox compound NIOCH-14. Journal of General Virology 2016;97(5):1229-39. - PubMed
Mbrenga 2022
McKenzie 2022
-
- McKenzie JE, Brennan SE. Chapter 12: Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook.
NHS 2022
-
- NHS Medway. FOI 5839 response. www.medway.nhs.uk/downloads/FOI%205839%20Response.pdf (accessed 15 December 2022).
NHS inform 2023
-
- Public Health Scotland. Mpox (monkeypox). www.nhsinform.scot/illnesses-and-conditions/infections-and-poisoning/mpox-monkeypox/ (accessed 9 February 2023).
NIAID 2022
-
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Mpox (formerly monkeypox) treatment. www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/mpox-treatment (accessed 6 February 2023).
O'Laughlin 2022
Ogoina 2022
Patel 2022
Rimoin 2010
Sbrana 2007
-
- Sbrana E, Jordan R, Hruby DE, Mateo RI, Xiao SY, Siirin M, et al. Efficacy of the antipoxvirus compound ST-246 for treatment of severe orthopoxvirus infection. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2007;76(4):768-73. - PubMed
Schünemann 2022
-
- Schünemann HJ, Higgins JP, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Skoetz N, et al. Chapter 14: Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Seley‐Radtke 2021
Shearer 2005
Siegrist 2022
Smith 2011
Sterne 2019
-
- Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898. - PubMed
Trost 2015
-
- Trost LC, Rose ML, Khouri J, Keilholz L, Long J, Godin SJ, et al. The efficacy and pharmacokinetics of brincidofovir for the treatment of lethal rabbitpox virus infection: a model of smallpox disease. Antiviral Research 2015;117:115-21. - PubMed
WHO 2022a
-
- World Health Organization. Monkeypox: experts give virus variants new names. www.who.int/news/item/12-08-2022-monkeypox--experts-give-virus-variants-... (accessed 9 February 2023).
WHO 2022b
-
- World Health Organization. WHO Director-General declares the ongoing monkeypox outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. www.who.int/europe/news/item/23-07-2022-who-director-general-declares-th... (accessed 6 February 2023).
WHO 2022c
-
- World Health Organization. Monkeypox factsheet. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/monkeypox (accessed 6 February 2023).
WHO 2023
-
- World Health Organization. Fourth meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) Emergency Committee on the multi-country outbreak of monkeypox (mpox). who.int/news/item/15-02-2023-fourth-meeting-of-the-international-health-... (accessed 02 March 2023).
Wittek 2006
-
- Wittek R. Vaccinia immune globulin: current policies, preparedness, and product safety and efficacy. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2006;10(3):193-201. - PubMed
Yu 2022
-
- Yu J, Raj SM. Efficacy of three key antiviral drugs used to treat orthopoxvirus infections: a systematic review. Global Biosecurity 2022;1:1. [DOI: 10.31646/gbio.12] - DOI
References to other published versions of this review
Fox 2022
-
- Fox T, Gould S, Princy N, Rowland T, Kuehn R. Therapeutics for treating mpox in humans. PROSPERO 2022. CRD42022382675. www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=382675 (accessed 9 December 2022).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous