Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 1;21(5):913-951.
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00112.

Identifying H1N1 and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or refusal among health care providers: a scoping review

Allyson J Gallant  1 , Andrew Harding  2 , Catie Johnson  3 , Audrey Steenbeek  4 , Janet A Curran  3   4
Affiliations

Identifying H1N1 and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or refusal among health care providers: a scoping review

Allyson J Gallant et al. JBI Evid Synth. .

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this review was to describe and map the evidence on COVID-19 and H1N1 vaccine hesitancy or refusal by physicians, nurses, and pharmacists in North America, the United Kingdom and the European Union, and Australia.

Introduction: Since 2009, we have experienced two pandemics: H1N1 "swine flu" and COVID-19. While severity and transmissibility of these viruses varied, vaccination has been a critical component of bringing both pandemics under control. However, uptake of these vaccines has been affected by vaccine hesitancy and refusal. The vaccination behaviors of health care providers, including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, are of particular interest as they have been priority populations to receive both H1N1 and COVID-19 vaccinations. Their vaccination views could affect the vaccination decisions of their patients.

Inclusion criteria: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they identified reasons for COVID-19 or H1N1 vaccine hesitancy or refusal among physicians, nurses, or pharmacists from the included countries. Published and unpublished literature were eligible for inclusion. Previous reviews were excluded; however, the reference lists of relevant reviews were searched to identify additional studies for inclusion.

Methods: A search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Premier databases was conducted April 28, 2021, to identify English-language literature published from 2009 to 2021. Gray literature and citation screening were also conducted to identify additional relevant literature. Titles, abstracts, and eligible full-text articles were reviewed in duplicate by 2 trained reviewers. Data were extracted in duplicate using a structured extraction tool developed for the review. Conflicts were resolved through discussion or with a third team member. Data were synthesized using narrative and tabular summaries.

Results: In total, 83 articles were included in the review. Studies were conducted primarily across the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. The majority of articles (n=70) used cross-sectional designs to examine knowledge, attitudes, and uptake of H1N1 (n=61) or COVID-19 (n=22) vaccines. Physicians, medical students, nurses, and nursing students were common participants in the studies; however, only 8 studies included pharmacists in their sample. Across health care settings, most studies were conducted in urban, academic teaching hospitals, with 1 study conducted in a rural hospital setting. Concerns about vaccine safety, vaccine side effects, and perceived low risk of contracting H1N1 or COVID-19 were the most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy or refusal across both vaccines.

Conclusions: With increased interest and attention on vaccines in recent years, intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic, more research that examines vaccine hesitancy or refusal across different health care settings and health care providers is warranted. Future work should aim to utilize more qualitative and mixed methods research designs to capture the personal perspectives of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, and consider collecting data beyond the common urban and academic health care settings identified in this review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search results and source selection and inclusion process
Figure 2
Figure 2
Factors affecting H1N1 vaccine hesitancy or refusal among health care providers
Figure 3
Figure 3
Factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy or refusal among health care providers
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization. Vaccines and immunization: what is vaccination? [internet] WHO; 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/vaccines-and-im... .
    1. Stokes S, Ismail K. Uptake of the H1N1 vaccine by maternity staff at a university hospital in the UK. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011;112(3):247. - PubMed
    1. Banholzer N, van Weenen E, Lison A, Cenedese A, Seelinger A, Kratzwald B, et al. . Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the number of new infections with COVID-19 during the first epidemic wave. PLoS One 2021;16(6):e0252827. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Public Health England. COVID-19 vaccination first phase priority groups [internet]. Gov.uk; 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 5]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-care-hom... .
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. COVID-19: Preliminary guidance on key populations for early immunization [internet]. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Government of Canada; 2020. [cited 2021 Apr 17]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/immunization/national-ad...

Publication types