Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 14;6(1):41.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00786-y.

Improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy with a smartphone application driven by artificial intelligence

Yan Zhu #  1   2 , Dan-Feng Zhang #  1   2 , Hui-Li Wu #  3 , Pei-Yao Fu #  1   2 , Li Feng #  4 , Kun Zhuang #  5 , Zi-Han Geng  1   2 , Kun-Kun Li  3 , Xiao-Hong Zhang  4 , Bo-Qun Zhu  1   2 , Wen-Zheng Qin  1   2 , Sheng-Li Lin  1   2 , Zhen Zhang  1   2 , Tian-Yin Chen  1   2 , Yuan Huang  1   2 , Xiao-Yue Xu  1   2 , Jing-Zheng Liu  1   2 , Shuo Wang  6   7 , Wei Zhang  8 , Quan-Lin Li  9   10 , Ping-Hong Zhou  11   12
Affiliations

Improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy with a smartphone application driven by artificial intelligence

Yan Zhu et al. NPJ Digit Med. .

Abstract

Optimal bowel preparation is a prerequisite for a successful colonoscopy; however, the rate of inadequate bowel preparation remains relatively high. In this study, we establish a smartphone app that assesses patient bowel preparation using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based prediction system trained on labeled photographs of feces in the toilet and evaluate its impact on bowel preparation quality in colonoscopy outpatients. We conduct a prospective, single-masked, multicenter randomized clinical trial, enrolling outpatients who own a smartphone and are scheduled for a colonoscopy. We screen 578 eligible patients and randomize 524 in a 1:1 ratio to the control or AI-driven app group for bowel preparation. The study endpoints are the percentage of patients with adequate bowel preparation and the total BBPS score, compliance with dietary restrictions and purgative instructions, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate (secondary). The prediction system has an accuracy of 95.15%, a specificity of 97.25%, and an area under the curve of 0.98 in the test dataset. In the full analysis set (n = 500), adequate preparation is significantly higher in the AI-driven app group (88.54 vs. 65.59%; P < 0.001). The mean BBPS score is 6.74 ± 1.25 in the AI-driven app group and 5.97 ± 1.81 in the control group (P < 0.001). The rates of compliance with dietary restrictions (93.68 vs. 83.81%, P = 0.001) and purgative instructions (96.05 vs. 84.62%, P < 0.001) are significantly higher in the AI-driven app group, as is the rate of additional purgative intake (26.88 vs. 17.41%, P = 0.011). Thus, our AI-driven smartphone app significantly improves the quality of bowel preparation and patient compliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ping-Hong Zhou, Quan-Lin Li, Yan Zhu, Shuo Wang, and Dan-Feng Zhang have a patent pending for AI-driven smartphone-guided bowel preparation (CN202210373305.1). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flowchart of the clinical trial.
AI artificial intelligence, App application.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Subgroup analysis of factors associated with the rate of adequate bowel preparation.
BMI body mass index, CRC colorectal cancer.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Entire process of creating the artificial intelligence-based bowel preparation prediction system.
AUC area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, Conv convolution.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bretthauer M, et al. Population-based colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2016;176:894–902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung JJ, et al. An updated Asia Pacific Consensus recommendations on colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2015;64:121–132. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306503. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gimeno-García AZ, et al. Comparison of two intensive bowel cleansing regimens in patients with previous poor bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2017;112:951–958. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.53. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hassan C, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:142–150. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326186. - DOI - PubMed