Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 15;12(1):18.
doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01072-5.

Dynamic variations in COVID-19 with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Kazakhstan and Pakistan

Affiliations

Dynamic variations in COVID-19 with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Kazakhstan and Pakistan

Qianqian Cui et al. Infect Dis Poverty. .

Abstract

Background: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the Omicron variant presents a formidable challenge for control and prevention worldwide, especially for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Hence, taking Kazakhstan and Pakistan as examples, this study aims to explore COVID-19 transmission with the Omicron variant at different contact, quarantine and test rates.

Methods: A disease dynamic model was applied, the population was segmented, and three time stages for Omicron transmission were established: the initial outbreak, a period of stabilization, and a second outbreak. The impact of population contact, quarantine and testing on the disease are analyzed in five scenarios to analysis their impacts on the disease. Four statistical metrics are employed to quantify the model's performance, including the correlation coefficient (CC), normalized absolute error, normalized root mean square error and distance between indices of simulation and observation (DISO).

Results: Our model has high performance in simulating COVID-19 transmission in Kazakhstan and Pakistan with high CC values greater than 0.9 and DISO values less than 0.5. Compared with the present measures (baseline), decreasing (increasing) the contact rates or increasing (decreasing) the quarantined rates can reduce (increase) the peak values of daily new cases and forward (delay) the peak value times (decreasing 842 and forward 2 days for Kazakhstan). The impact of the test rates on the disease are weak. When the start time of stage II is 6 days, the daily new cases are more than 8 and 5 times the rate for Kazakhstan and Pakistan, respectively (29,573 vs. 3259; 7398 vs. 1108). The impact of the start times of stage III on the disease are contradictory to those of stage II.

Conclusions: For the two LMICs, Kazakhstan and Pakistan, stronger control and prevention measures can be more effective in combating COVID-19. Therefore, to reduce Omicron transmission, strict management of population movement should be employed. Moreover, the timely application of these strategies also plays a key role in disease control.

Keywords: COVID-19; Cumulative confirmed cases; Daily new confirmed cases; Omicron; Pandemic; Prediction; Simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare on competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the COVID-19 dynamic model of Kazakhstan and Pakistan
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Simulation and prediction of daily new confirmed cases (a) and cumulative confirmed cases (b) Kazakhstan
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Simulation and prediction of daily new confirmed cases (a) and cumulative confirmed cases (b) for Pakistan
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Scenario results of the different contact rates for daily new COVID-19 cases in Kazakhstan (a) and Pakistan (b)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Scenario results of the different quarantine rates for daily new COVID-19 cases in Kazakhstan (a) and Pakistan (b)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Scenario results of the different detection rates for daily new COVID-19 cases in Kazakhstan (a) and Pakistan (b)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Scenario results of the different start times of stage II for daily new COVID-19 cases in Kazakhstan (a) and Pakistan (b)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Scenario results of the different start times of stage III for daily new COVID-19 cases in Kazakhstan (a) and Pakistan (b)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andeweg S, Gier B, Eggink D, et al. Protection of COVID-19 vaccination and previous infection against Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and Delta SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4738. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31838-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jalali N, Brustad H, Frigessi A. Increased household transmission and immune escape of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron compared to Delta variants. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5706. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33233-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rana R, Kant R, Huirem R, et al. Omicron variant: current insights and future directions. Microbiol Res. 2022;265:127204. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127204. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vogel G. New Omicron strains may portend big COVID-19 waves. Science. 2022;377:6614. doi: 10.1126/science.adf0777. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torbati E, Krause KL, Ussher J, et al. The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern. Viruses. 2021;13:1911. doi: 10.3390/v13101911. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts