An overview and a roadmap for artificial intelligence in hematology and oncology
- PMID: 36920563
- PMCID: PMC10374829
- DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04667-5
An overview and a roadmap for artificial intelligence in hematology and oncology
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is influencing our society on many levels and has broad implications for the future practice of hematology and oncology. However, for many medical professionals and researchers, it often remains unclear what AI can and cannot do, and what are promising areas for a sensible application of AI in hematology and oncology. Finally, the limits and perils of using AI in oncology are not obvious to many healthcare professionals.
Methods: In this article, we provide an expert-based consensus statement by the joint Working Group on "Artificial Intelligence in Hematology and Oncology" by the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO), the German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (GMDS), and the Special Interest Group Digital Health of the German Informatics Society (GI). We provide a conceptual framework for AI in hematology and oncology.
Results: First, we propose a technological definition, which we deliberately set in a narrow frame to mainly include the technical developments of the last ten years. Second, we present a taxonomy of clinically relevant AI systems, structured according to the type of clinical data they are used to analyze. Third, we show an overview of potential applications, including clinical, research, and educational environments with a focus on hematology and oncology.
Conclusion: Thus, this article provides a point of reference for hematologists and oncologists, and at the same time sets forth a framework for the further development and clinical deployment of AI in hematology and oncology in the future.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Computer vision; Digital health; Large language models; Machine learning.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
JNK reports consulting services for Owkin, France, Panakeia, UK, and DoMore Diagnostics, Norway and has received honoraria for lectures by MSD, Eisai, and Fresenius. WR reports travel support from Janssen, AstraZeneca and Amgen, honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca and received a grant from Novartis. NvB received honoraria from Takeda and travel support from Janssen-Cilag.MS receives funding from Pfizer Inc. for a project not related to the topic of this paper.BR has no conflicts of interest. JMM reports consulting services for Janssen, Roche, Gilead, Abbvie, Jazz, Pfizer, Astellas, Novartis and funding of scientific projects from Janssen, Jazz, Novartis and Astellas. The other authors do not report any conflicts of interest.
Figures

References
-
- Alexander A, Jiang A, Ferreira C, Zurkiya D (2020) An intelligent future for medical imaging: a market outlook on artificial intelligence for medical imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 17:165–170 - PubMed
-
- Andaur NC et al (2023) Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol 154:8–22 - PubMed
-
- Balasubramaniam V, 2021 Artificial intelligence algorithm with SVM classification using dermascopic images for melanoma diagnosis. March.3: 34–42
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources