Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282883.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282883. eCollection 2023.

Maternal characteristics associated with referral to obstetrician-led care in low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study

Susan Niessink-Beckers  1 , Corine J Verhoeven  1   2   3 , Marleen J Nahuis  4 , Lisanne A Horvat-Gitsels  5 , Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal  1
Affiliations

Maternal characteristics associated with referral to obstetrician-led care in low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study

Susan Niessink-Beckers et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: In the Netherlands, maternity care is divided into midwife-led care (for low-risk women) and obstetrician-led care (for high-risk women). Referrals from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care have increased over the past decade. The majority of women are referred during their pregnancy or labour. Referrals are based on a continuous risk assessment of the health and characteristics of mother and child, yet referral for non-medical factors and characteristics remain unclear. This study investigated which maternal characteristics are associated with women's referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study in one midwife-led care practice in the Netherlands included 1096 low-risk women during January 2015-17. The primary outcomes were referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care in (1) the antepartum period and (2) the intrapartum period. In total, 11 maternal characteristics were identified. Logistic regression models of referral in each period were fitted and stratified by parity.

Results: In the antepartum period, referral among nulliparous women was associated with an older maternal age (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.05-1.09), being underweight (0.45; 0.31-0.64), overweight (2.29; 1.91-2.74), or obese (2.65; 2.06-3.42), a preconception period >1 year (1.34; 1.07-1.66), medium education level (0.76; 0.58-1.00), deprivation (1.87; 1.54-2.26), and sexual abuse (1.44; 1.14-1.82). Among multiparous women, a referral was associated with being underweight (0.40; 0.26-0.60), obese (1.61; 1.30-1.98), a preconception period >1 year (1.71; 1.27-2.28), employment (1.38; 1.19-1.61), deprivation (1.23; 1.03-1.46), highest education level (0.63; 0.51-0.80), psychological problems (1.24; 1.06-1.44), and one or multiple consultations with an obstetrician (0.68; 0.58-0.80 and 0.64; 0.54-0.76, respectively). In the intrapartum period, referral among nulliparous women was associated with an older maternal age (1.02; 1.00-1.05), being underweight (1.67; 1.15-2.42), a preconception period >1 year (0.42; 0.31-0.57), medium or high level of education (2.09; 1.49-2.91 or 1.56; 1.10-2.22, respectively), sexual abuse (0.46; 0.33-0.63), and multiple consultations with an obstetrician (1.49; 1.15-1.94). Among multiparous women, referral was associated with an older maternal age (1.02; 1.00-1.04), being overweight (0.65; 0.51-0.83), a preconception period >1 year (0.33; 0.17-0.65), non-Dutch ethnicity (1.98; 1.61-2.45), smoking (0.75; 0.57-0.97), sexual abuse (1.49; 1.09-2.02), and one or multiple consultations with an obstetrician (1.34; 1.06-1.70 and 2.09; 1.63-2.69, respectively).

Conclusions: This exploratory study showed that several non-medical maternal characteristics of low-risk pregnant women are associated with referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care, and how these differ by parity and partum period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Reasons for referral antepartum & intrapartum.
(A) Reasons for referral in the antepartum period. (B) Reasons for referral in the intrapartum period.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;4:Cd004667. Epub 2016/04/29. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, 2001. [ISBN 1–900364–66–2.].
    1. Perined. Perinatal Care in the Netherlands 2002–2021. In Dutch, available from: https://www.perined.nl/onderwerpen/publicaties-perined/jaarboek-zorg Accessed februari 2018.
    1. Amelink-Verburg MP, Buitendijk SE. Pregnancy and Labour in the Dutch Maternity Care System: What Is Normal? The Role Division Between Midwives and Obstetricians. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2010;55(3):216–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Offerhaus PM. Patterns in primary midwife-led care in the Netherlands. Trends and variation in intrapartum referrals. Radboud University Nijmegen. 2015:9–10.