Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 1;208(1):59-67.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.202301-0084OC.

Phase 3 Open-Label Clinical Trial of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children Aged 2-5 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele

Affiliations

Phase 3 Open-Label Clinical Trial of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children Aged 2-5 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele

Jennifer L Goralski et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Rationale: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) has been shown to be safe and effective in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged ⩾6 years with at least one F508del-CFTR allele but has not been studied in younger children. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children with CF aged 2-5 years. Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, two-part study (parts A and B), children weighing <14 kg (on Day 1) received ELX 80 mg once daily (qd), TEZ 40 mg qd, and IVA 60 mg each morning and 59.5 mg each evening; children weighing ⩾14 kg received ELX 100 mg qd, TEZ 50 mg qd, and IVA 75 mg every 12 hours. Measurements and Main Results: The primary endpoints for part A (15-d treatment period) were pharmacokinetics and safety and tolerability. For part B (24-wk treatment period), the primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and absolute changes from baseline in sweat chloride concentration and lung clearance index2.5 (LCI2.5, defined as the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal N2 concentration to 2.5% of its starting value) through Week 24. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data from 18 children enrolled in part A confirmed the appropriateness of the part B dosing regimen. In part B, 75 children (F508del/minimal function genotypes, n = 52; F508del/F508del genotype, n = 23) were enrolled and dosed. Seventy-four children (98.7%) had adverse events, which were all mild (62.7%) or moderate (36.0%) in severity. The most common adverse events were cough, fever, and rhinorrhea. Decreases in sweat chloride concentration (-57.9 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -61.3 to -54.6; n = 69) and LCI2.5 (-0.83 U; 95% CI, -1.01 to -0.66; n = 50) were observed from baseline through Week 24. Mean body mass index was within the normal range at baseline and remained stable at Week 24. Conclusions: In this open-label study in children 2-5 years of age, ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that observed in older age groups, and led to clinically meaningful reductions in sweat chloride concentration and LCI2.5. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04537793).

Keywords: CF; ELX; IVA; TEZ; preschool children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition diagram for part B of the study. AE = adverse event.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pharmacokinetic exposure simulations. In each box plot, the median is represented by the horizontal line and the interquartile range by the box. Whisker marks indicate the largest and smallest within 1.5× the interquartile range. The gray area represents the 5th percentile (bottom border) and 95th percentile (top border), the green line represents the 50th percentile of the adult area under the curve values, and the red line represents the no observable adverse events level. AUC = area under the curve; ELX = elexacaftor; IVA = ivacaftor; M1 = metabolite 1; M23 = metabolite 23; NOAEL = no observable adverse events level; q12h = once every 12 hours; qd = once daily; TEZ = tezacaftor. *Children received ivacaftor 60 mg in the morning and ivacaftor 59.5 mg in the evening.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Secondary efficacy results by visit in part B. (A) Mean (SE) change from baseline in sweat chloride concentration is shown for each visit. (B) Mean (SE) change from baseline in LCI2.5 is shown for each visit. LCI2.5 = lung clearance index2.5; LS = least squares.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Changes in growth parameters and fecal elastase-1 concentrations by visit in part B of the study. Mean (SE) absolute change from baseline in the growth parameters (A) BMI-for-age z-score, (B) weight-for-age z-score, and (C) height-for-age z-score for each study visit. (D) Spaghetti plot showing individual changes from baseline in fecal elastase-1 concentration at each visit. Blue lines indicate children with at least one fecal elastase-1 measurement >200 µg/g at a study visit. BMI = body mass index; LS = least squares.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Sweat chloride responder analysis by genotype group. The percentage of children in each genotype group (F/F and F/MF) with sweat chloride concentrations <60 mmol/L and <30 mmol/L at Week 24 is shown. Percentages were calculated by dividing the number of children with sweat chloride concentrations below the indicated threshold at Week 24 by the total number of children with evaluable data. Children with missing data were considered to be missing at random and were not counted in the denominator. F/F = homozygous for the F508del–cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutation; F/MF = heterozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation and a minimal-function CFTR mutation.

Comment in

  • Cystic Fibrosis: From Tragedy to Triumph.
    Ramsey B, Bush A. Ramsey B, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Jul 1;208(1):9-11. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202305-0785ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37167625 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Riordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem B, Alon N, Rozmahel R, Grzelczak Z, et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science . 1989;245:1066–1073. - PubMed
    1. VanDevanter DR, Kahle JS, O’Sullivan AK, Sikirica S, Hodgkins PS. Cystic fibrosis in young children: a review of disease manifestation, progression, and response to early treatment. J Cyst Fibros . 2016;15:147–157. - PubMed
    1. Hoo AF, Thia LP, Nguyen TT, Bush A, Chudleigh J, Lum S, et al. London Cystic Fibrosis Collaboration Lung function is abnormal in 3-month-old infants with cystic fibrosis diagnosed by newborn screening. Thorax . 2012;67:874–881. - PubMed
    1. Stick SM, Brennan S, Murray C, Douglas T, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Garratt LW, et al. Australian Respiratory Early Surveillance Team for Cystic Fibrosis (AREST CF) Bronchiectasis in infants and preschool children diagnosed with cystic fibrosis after newborn screening. J Pediatr . 2009;155:623–628.e1. - PubMed
    1. Abu-El-Haija M, Ramachandran S, Meyerholz DK, Abu-El-Haija M, Griffin M, Giriyappa RL, et al. Pancreatic damage in fetal and newborn cystic fibrosis pigs involves the activation of inflammatory and remodeling pathways. Am J Pathol . 2012;181:499–507. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data