Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr;56(2):416-427.
doi: 10.1002/jaba.981. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

A review of methods of assessing preference for social stimuli

Affiliations
Review

A review of methods of assessing preference for social stimuli

Samuel L Morris et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Research on preference and reinforcer assessments has historically focused on the evaluation of edible and leisure reinforcers, but the identification and use of individualized social reinforcers may be beneficial for several reasons. Recently, many studies have evaluated methods of assessing preference for social stimuli. The procedures and outcomes across these studies have varied greatly, and the current state of evidence for methods of assessing preference for social stimuli remains unclear. Thus, we conducted a review to synthesize all previous research in this area, evaluate the evidence for the utility of this general methodology, and identify factors that may influence its utility. Our results suggest that social preference assessments are likely to produce results that correspond with reinforcer assessment hierarchies. Preference assessment modality was one factor that influenced utility; video-based preference assessments had greater correspondence with reinforcer assessments than did other modalities. Directions for future research and implications for the use of social preference assessments in research and practices are discussed.

Keywords: attention; preference assessment; reinforcer assessment; social interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Behavior Analysis Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code. Retrieved from https://bacb.com/ethics-code/
    1. Briggs, A. M., Dozier, C. L., Lessor, A. N., Kamana, B. U., & Jess, R. L. (2019). Further investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction for escape-maintained destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(4), 956-973. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.648
    1. *Butler, C., & Graff, R. B. (2021). Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(2), 684-699. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.807
    1. Campanaro, A. M., Vladescu, J. C., Kodak, T., DeBar, R. M., & Nippes, K. C. (2020). Comparing skill acquisition under varying onsets of differential reinforcement: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(2), 690-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.615
    1. Chen, M. H., Lan, W. H., Hsu, J. W., Huang, K. L., Su, T. P., Li, C. T., Lin, W. C., Tsai, C. F., Tsai, S. J., Lee, Y. C., Chen, Y. S., Pan, T. L., Chang, W. H., Chen, T. J., & Bai, Y. M. (2016). Risk of developing type 2 diabetes in adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A nationwide longitudinal study. Diabetes Care, 39(5), 788-793. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1807

LinkOut - more resources