Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 6:2023:8506738.
doi: 10.1155/2023/8506738. eCollection 2023.

The Probiotic Lactobacillus sakei Subsp. Sakei and Hawthorn Extract Supplements Improved Growth Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Immunity, and Resistance to the Pesticide Acetamiprid in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Affiliations

The Probiotic Lactobacillus sakei Subsp. Sakei and Hawthorn Extract Supplements Improved Growth Performance, Digestive Enzymes, Immunity, and Resistance to the Pesticide Acetamiprid in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Abdul-Hassan Mahdi Salih et al. Aquac Nutr. .

Abstract

This study evaluated the impacts of the probiotic, Lactobacillus sakei (L. sakei), and the extract of hawthorn, Crataegus elbursensis, on growth and immunity of the common carp exposed to acetamiprid. Fish (mean ± SE: 11.48 ± 0.1 g) feeding was done with formulated diets (T 1 (control): no supplementation, T 2: 1 × 106 CFU/g LS (Lactobacillus sakei), T3: 1 × 108 CFU/g LS, T 4: 0.5% hawthorn extract (HWE), and T 5: 1% HWE) for 60 days and then exposed to acetamiprid for 14 days. The growth performance improved in the fish fed LS at dietary level of 1 × 108 CFU/g, even after exposure to acetamiprid (P < 0.05). Intestinal Lactobacillus sakei (CFU/g) load increased (P < 0.05), following supplementation with the probiotic-enriched diet. The LS-treated fish had increases in the activity of digestive enzymes (P < 0.05). Both LS and HWE stimulated antioxidant enzymes and immune system components in serum and mucus (alkaline phosphatase (ALP), protease, total Ig, and lysozyme) (P < 0.05). However, the changes were different depending on the kind of the supplement. The malondialdehyde (MDA) levels decreased in HWE-treated fish after acetamiprid exposure (P < 0.05). Both LS and HWE reduced the liver metabolic enzymes (LDH, ALP, AST, ALT, and LDH) in serum both before and after exposure to the pesticide (P < 0.05). However, each enzyme exhibited a different change trend depending on the type of the supplement. HWE showed a stress-ameliorating effect, as glucose and cortisol levels declined in the HWE-treated fish (P < 0.05). This study indicated the immunomodulatory impacts of LS (1 × 108 CFU/g) and HWE (at dietary levels of 0.5-1%). The probiotic showed more performance compared to HWE. However, the HWE mitigated oxidative stress more efficiently than the probiotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The mucus immune parameters in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, after 60 days of supplementation with experimental diets: T1 (control): nonsupplemented fish; T2: fish fed diet containing 1 × 106 probiotic; T3: fish fed diet containing 1 × 108 probiotic; T4: fish fed diet containing 0.5% hawthorn extract; T5: fish fed diet containing 1% hawthorn extract. Total Ig: total immunoglobulin; ALP: alkaline phosphatase activity. Data represented as mean ± SE. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

References

    1. Nicolopoulou-Stamati P., Maipas S., Kotampasi C., Stamatis P., Hens L. Chemical pesticides and human health: the urgent need for a new concept in agriculture. Frontiers in Public Health . 2016;4:p. 148. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mojiri A., Zhou J. L., Robinson B., et al. Pesticides in aquatic environments and their removal by adsorption methods. Chemosphere . 2020;253, article 126646 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126646. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akhter N., Wu B., Memon A. M., Mohsin M. Probiotics and prebiotics associated with aquaculture: a review. Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 2015;45(2):733–741. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.05.038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hai N. V. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Journal of Applied Microbiology . 2015;119(4):917–935. doi: 10.1111/jam.12886. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sahu M. K., Swarnakumar N. S., Sivakumar K., Thangaradjou T., Kannan L. Probiotics in aquaculture: importance and future perspectives. Indian Journal of Microbiology . 2008;48(3):299–308. doi: 10.1007/s12088-008-0024-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed