Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 15;105-B(4):356-360.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B4.BJJ-2022-1190.R2.

The value of national arthroplasty registry data in 2023

Affiliations
Review

The value of national arthroplasty registry data in 2023

Paul N Baker et al. Bone Joint J. .

Abstract

The importance of registries has been brought into focus by recent UK national reports focusing on implant (Cumberlege) and surgeon (Paterson) performance. National arthroplasty registries provide real-time, real-world information about implant, hospital, and surgeon performance and allow case identification in the event of product recall or adverse surgical outcomes. They are a valuable resource for research and service improvement given the volume of data recorded and the longitunidal nature of data collection. This review discusses the current value of registry data as it relates to both clinical practice and research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P. N. Baker is a NIHR grant holder for the OPAL study (NIHR HTA), the R&D Director for South Tees NHS Trust, the RCS Lead for Orthopaedic Research, a HTA commissioning panel member, and has participated in the trial steering committee for RACER-KNEE and NICE guideline and quality assurance committees. P. N. Baker also reports a co-application for the TIDE study (NIHR HTA), and speaker fees from Firstkind Ltd, which are unrelated to this article.

References

    1. Lübbeke A , Silman AJ , Prieto-Alhambra D , Adler AI , Barea C , Carr AJ . The role of national registries in improving patient safety for hip and knee replacements . BMC Musculoskelet Disord . 2017 ; 18 ( 1 ): 414 . 10.1186/s12891-017-1773-0 29037237
    1. Graves SE . The value of arthroplasty registry data . Acta Orthop . 2010 ; 81 ( 1 ): 8 – 9 . 10.3109/17453671003667184 20170422
    1. Horan FT . Joint registries . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2010 ; 92-B ( 6 ): 749 – 750 .
    1. Robertsson O . Knee arthroplasty registers . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2007 ; 89-B ( 1 ): 1 – 4 . 10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18327 17259406
    1. Porter M , Armstrong R , Howard P , Porteous M , Wilkinson JM . Orthopaedic registries - the UK view (National Joint Registry): impact on practice . EFORT Open Rev . 2019 ; 4 ( 6 ): 377 – 390 . 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180084 31210975