Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun:68:42-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

Toxicities of herbal abortifacients

Affiliations
Review

Toxicities of herbal abortifacients

Chris Feng et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In the post-Roe era, barriers to facility-based abortions may lead to an increased incidence of self-managed abortions. While misoprostol-based medication abortions have significant literature supporting its safety profile, there is a knowledge deficit within the medical community regarding the toxicities of commonly used herbal abortifacients.

Methods: This is a narrative review, based on a MEDLINE and HOLLIS database search, of self-managed abortion methods with herbal abortifacients and their associated toxicities.

Results: Common herbal abortifacients with significant morbidity and mortality implications include pennyroyal, blue cohosh, rue, and quinine. Other commonly reported abortifacients considered to be less toxic also are discussed in brief. Special considerations for hepatic, cardiac, renal, and hematologic toxicities are important in patients with significant exposures to these herbal substances.

Conclusion: There is an anticipated increase in the utility of herbal xenobiotics for self-managed abortions with post-Roe restrictions to standard mifepristone-misoprostol protocols. Frontline providers should be aware of the associated toxicities and have special considerations when treating a poisoned patient in this population.

Keywords: Abortifacient toxicity; Emergency care; Herbal abortifacient; Self-managed abortion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no other conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

Similar articles

References

    1. Moseson H, Herold S, Filippa S, Barr-Walker J, Baum SE, Gerdts C. Self-managed abortion: A systematic scoping review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;63:87–110. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.08.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nash E State Abortion Policy Landscape: From Hostile to Supportive | Guttmacher Institute. Accessed October 15, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2019/08/state-abortion-policy-landsca...
    1. State legislation tracker. Guttmacher Institute. Published October 4, 2021. Accessed October 18, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy
    1. Aiken ARA, Romanova EP, Morber JR, Gomperts R. Safety and effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion provided using online telemedicine in the United States: A population based study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;10:100200. doi:10.1016/j.lana.2022.100200 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Society of Family Planning Interim Clinical Recommendations Self-Managed Abortion. The Society of Family Planning; 2022. doi:10.46621/ZRDX9581 - DOI