Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 28:14:1075953.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1075953. eCollection 2023.

Dimensions of inattention: Cognitive, behavioral, and affective consequences

Affiliations

Dimensions of inattention: Cognitive, behavioral, and affective consequences

Jennifer M Yip et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Inattention to one's on-going task leads to well-documented cognitive, behavioral, and physiological consequences. At the same time, the reliable association between mind-wandering and negative mood has suggested that there are affective consequences to task inattention as well. We examined this potential relationship between inattention and mood in the following study. Six hundred and fifty-five participants completed self-report questionnaires related to inattentive thinking (i.e., attentional lapses, daydreaming, mindfulness, rumination, reflection, worry, postevent processing, inattentiveness, and counterfactual thinking), a questionnaire about depressive symptoms, and a questionnaire about anxiety symptoms. First, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify potential underlying constructs of types of inattentive thinking. Using ordinary least squares extraction and Oblimin rotation, a three-factor model demonstrated suitable fit, broadly representing mind-wandering/inattentive consequences, repetitive negative thinking, and reflective/introspective thinking. Second, after eliminating measures that did not strongly load on any factor, structural equation modeling was conducted and found that the relationship between mind-wandering and depression was partially explained by repetitive negative thinking, whereas the relationship between mind-wandering and anxiety was fully explained by repetitive negative thinking. The present findings suggest that understanding how inattentive thoughts are interrelated not only influences mood and affect but also reveals important considerations of intentionality, executive functioning, and qualitative styles of these thoughts.

Keywords: anxiety; daydreaming; depression; inattention; mind-wandering; mood; perseverative cognition; repetitive negative thoughts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SEM model representing repetitive negative thoughts as a mediator in the relationship between cognitive-behavioral consequences of inattention and depressive/anxiety symptoms. N = 612. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Partial mediation of Repetitive Negative Thoughts (RNTs) was supported for consequences of inattention effect on depressive symptoms, and full mediation of RNTs was supported for consequences of inattention effect on anxiety symptoms. Standardized ßs are reported. ARCES, Attention-Related Cognitive Errors Scale; MAAS, Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale; CSS, Current Symptoms Scale; CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; STAI, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; RRQ-Rum, Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire Rumination Subscale; PSWQ, Penn State Worry Questionnaire; RRS-Brood, Rumination Responses Scale Brooding Subscale; PEPQ-R, Post-Event Processing Questionnaire-Revised.

References

    1. Arabaci G., Parris B. A. (2018). Probe-caught spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering in relation to self-reported inattentive, hyperactive and impulsive traits in adults. Sci. Rep. 8, 4113–4110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22390-x, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aust F., Diedenhofen B., Ullrich S., Musch J. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behav. Res. Methods 45, 527–535. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baird B., Smallwood J., Schooler J. W. (2011). Back to the future: autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 1604–1611. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbey A. K., Patterson R. (2011). Architecture of explanatory inference in the human prefrontal cortex. Front. Psychol. 2:162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00162, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barkley R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol. Bull. 121, 65–94. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources