Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 28:10:1060720.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1060720. eCollection 2023.

Improving welfare assessment in aquaculture

Affiliations

Improving welfare assessment in aquaculture

Heather Browning. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

While global aquaculture is rapidly expanding, there remains little attention given to the assessment of animal welfare within aquacultural systems. It is crucial that animal welfare concerns are central in the development and implementation of aquaculture as if they are not prioritized early on, it becomes much more difficult to adapt in future. To this end, it is important to ensure the availability of high-quality welfare assessment schemes to evaluate the welfare of animals in aquaculture and promote and maintain high welfare standards. This paper will first discuss some of the current certification and assessment frameworks, highlighting the primary limitations that need to be addressed, before going on to describe the recommendations for a best-practice welfare assessment process for aquaculture; with the hope that these considerations can be taken on board and used to help improve welfare assessment for aquaculture and, ultimately, to ensure animals used in aquaculture have a higher level of welfare. Any aquacultural system should be assessed according to a suitable framework in order to be considered adequate for the welfare of the animals it contains, and thus to maintain social license to operate.

Keywords: aquaculture; assessment; certification; fish; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH, Bush SR, Cao L, Klinger DH, et al. . A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature. (2021) 591:551–63. 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Narshi TM, Free D, Justice WSM, Smith SJ, Wolfensohn S. Welfare assessment of invertebrates: adapting the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for zoo decapods and cephalopods. Animals. (2022) 12:1675. 10.3390/ani12131675 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braithwaite VA, Droege P. Why human pain can't tell us whether fish feel pain. Anim Sentience. (2016) 1:3. 10.51291/2377-7478.1041 - DOI
    1. Dinets V. No cortex, no cry. Anim Sentience. (2016) 1:7. 10.51291/2377-7478.1027 - DOI
    1. Elwood RW. A single strand of argument with unfounded conclusion. Anim Sentience. (2016) 1:19. 10.51291/2377-7478.1056 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources