Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 28:11:1127578.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1127578. eCollection 2023.

Exploring listening-related fatigue in children with and without hearing loss using self-report and parent-proxy measures

Affiliations

Exploring listening-related fatigue in children with and without hearing loss using self-report and parent-proxy measures

Bethany Adams et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Children with hearing loss appear to experience greater fatigue than children with normal hearing (CNH). Listening-related fatigue is often associated with an increase in effortful listening or difficulty in listening situations. This has been observed in children with bilateral hearing loss (CBHL) and, more recently, in children with unilateral hearing loss (CUHL). Available tools for measuring fatigue in children include general fatigue questionnaires such as the child self-report and parent-proxy versions of the PedsQLTM-Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (MFS) and the PROMIS Fatigue Scale. Recently, the Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale (VFS-C: child self-report; VFS-P: parent-proxy report) was introduced with a specific focus on listening-related fatigue. The aims of this study were to compare fatigue levels experienced by CNH, CUHL and CBHL using both generic and listening-specific fatigue measures and compare outcomes from the child self-report and parent-proxy reports. Eighty children aged 6-16 years (32 CNH, 19 CUHL, 29 CBHL), and ninety-nine parents/guardians (39 parents to CNH, 23 parents to CUHL, 37 parents to CBHL), completed the above fatigue questionnaires online. Kruskal-Wallis H tests were performed to compare fatigue levels between the CNH, CUHL and CBHL. To determine the agreement between parent-proxy and child self-report measures, Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were performed. All child self-report fatigue measures indicated that CBHL experience greater fatigue than CNH. Only the listening-specific tool (VFS-C) was sufficiently able to show greater fatigue in CUHL than in CNH. Similarly, all parent-proxy measures of fatigue indicated that CBHL experience significantly greater fatigue than CNH. The VFS-P and the PROMIS Fatigue Parent-Proxy also showed greater fatigue in CUHL than in CNH. Agreement between the parent-proxy and child self-report measures were found within the PedsQL-MFS and the PROMIS Fatigue Scale. Our results suggest that CBHL experience greater levels of daily-life fatigue compared to CNH. CUHL also appear to experience more fatigue than CNH, and listening-specific measures of fatigue may be better able to detect this effect. Further research is needed to understand the bases of fatigue in these populations and to clarify whether fatigue experienced by CBHL and CUHL is comparable in nature and degree.

Keywords: children; fatigue; hearing loss; quality of life; self-report; unilateral hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study format for parent/guardian and child participants. For child self-report section, parent consented for children aged 6-15 years old, and children assented. Children who were aged 16 provided their own consent. PIS = Patient Information Sheet. Shaded boxes are fatigue questionnaires.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median pediatric quality of life inventory multidimensional fatigue scale (pedsQL-MFS) scores for child self-report (left) and parent-proxy (right) respondents. Error bars shown represent medians ± IQRs. Lower values indicate greater fatigue. CNH; white bars, CUHL; oblique stripes, CBHL; black bars respectively. Asterisks show significant differences between groups (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Median item response theory (IRT) scale scores for the VFS-children (left) and VFS-parent (right). Greater values indicate a greater level of fatigue. Bars and error bars shown represent medians ± IQRs. CNH; white bars, CUHL; oblique stripes, CBHL; black bars respectively. Asterisks show significant differences between groups (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Median PROMIS fatigue short form 10a T-scores for the child self-report (left) and parent-proxy (right) respondents. Higher values indicate greater fatigue. Bars and error bars shown represent medians ± IQRs. CNH; white bars, CUHL; oblique stripes, CBHL; black bars respectively. Asterisks show significant differences between groups (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

References

    1. O'Connor PJ. Evaluation of four highly cited energy and fatigue mood measures. J Psychosom Res. (2004) 57(5):435–41. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2003.12.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holman JA, Hornsby BWY, Bess FH, Naylor G. Can listening-related fatigue influence well-being? Examining associations between hearing loss, fatigue, activity levels and well-being. Int J Audiol. (2021) 60(sup2):47–59. 10.1080/14992027.2020.1853261 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhanbali S, Dawes P, Lloyd S, Munro KJ. Self-Reported Listening-Related Effort and Fatigue in Hearing-Impaired Adults. Ear Hear. (2017) 38(1):e39–48. 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000361 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bess FH, Davis H, Camarata S, Hornsby BWY. Listening-Related Fatigue in Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. (2020) 51(1):84–97. 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-OCHL-19-0017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bess FH, Hornsby BWY. The Complexities of Fatigue in Children with Hearing Loss. Perspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders in Childhood. (2014) 24(2):25–39. 10.1044/hhdc24.2.25 - DOI