Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 15:2:893826.
doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2022.893826. eCollection 2022.

Evolution of Cortical Functional Networks in Healthy Infants

Affiliations

Evolution of Cortical Functional Networks in Healthy Infants

Derek K Hu et al. Front Netw Physiol. .

Abstract

During normal childhood development, functional brain networks evolve over time in parallel with changes in neuronal oscillations. Previous studies have demonstrated differences in network topology with age, particularly in neonates and in cohorts spanning from birth to early adulthood. Here, we evaluate the developmental changes in EEG functional connectivity with a specific focus on the first 2 years of life. Functional connectivity networks (FCNs) were calculated from the EEGs of 240 healthy infants aged 0-2 years during wakefulness and sleep using a cross-correlation-based measure and the weighted phase lag index. Topological features were assessed via network strength, global clustering coefficient, characteristic path length, and small world measures. We found that cross-correlation FCNs maintained a consistent small-world structure, and the connection strengths increased after the first 3 months of infancy. The strongest connections in these networks were consistently located in the frontal and occipital regions across age groups. In the delta and theta bands, weighted phase lag index networks decreased in strength after the first 3 months in both wakefulness and sleep, and a similar result was found in the alpha and beta bands during wakefulness. However, in the alpha band during sleep, FCNs exhibited a significant increase in strength with age, particularly in the 21-24 months age group. During this period, a majority of the strongest connections in the networks were located in frontocentral regions, and a qualitatively similar distribution was seen in the beta band during sleep for subjects older than 3 months. Graph theory analysis suggested a small world structure for weighted phase lag index networks, but to a lesser degree than those calculated using cross-correlation. In general, graph theory metrics showed little change over time, with no significant differences between age groups for the clustering coefficient (wakefulness and sleep), characteristics path length (sleep), and small world measure (sleep). These results suggest that infant FCNs evolve during the first 2 years with more significant changes to network strength than features of the network structure. This study quantifies normal brain networks during infant development and can serve as a baseline for future investigations in health and neurological disease.

Keywords: brain mapping; development; electroencephalography; functional connectivity; graph theory; pediatrics; resting-state networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Average CC FCNs for healthy infants during (A) wakefulness and (B) sleep. The strongest 10% of connections in each age group are shown. The color of each connection represents the connection strength, defined as the percentage of epochs with significant connectivity values.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean network strength by age for healthy infants using CC connectivity during (A) wakefulness and (B) sleep. Here, mean network strength is defined as the mean of the 10% highest connectivity values. Significance levels are *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, with p-values modified using the Bonferroni method.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Average wPLI FCNs for healthy infants in the (A) delta, (B) theta, (C) alpha, and (D) beta band during wakefulness (top) and sleep (bottom). The strongest 10% of connections in each age group are shown. The color of each connection represents the connection strength, defined as the percentage of epochs with significant connectivity values.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Mean network strength by age using wPLI connectivity in the (A) delta, (B) theta, (C) alpha, and (D) beta band during wakefulness (top) and sleep (bottom). Here, mean network strength is defined as the mean of the 10% highest connectivity values. Significance levels are *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, with p-values modified using the Bonferroni method.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Graph theory measures by age for healthy infants using CC connectivity for the (A) normalized global clustering coefficient, (B) normalized characteristic path length, and (C) small-world measure during wakefulness (top) and sleep (bottom). For each subfigure, the solid gray line represents the median value using randomly rewired networks and the dashed gray lines represent the 25th and 75th percentiles. Significance levels are *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, with p-values modified using the Bonferroni method.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Small-world measure by age for healthy infants using wPLI connectivity in the (A) delta, (B) theta, (C) alpha, and (D) beta band during wakefulness (top) and sleep (bottom). For each subfigure, the solid gray line represents the median value using randomly rewired networks and the dashed gray lines represent the 25th and 75th percentiles. Significance levels are *p < 0.05, **p < 0.1, and ***p < 0.001, with p-values modified using the Bonferroni method.

References

    1. Antoniou I. E., Tsompa E. T. (2008). Statistical Analysis of Weighted Networks. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2008, 1–16. 10.1155/2008/375452 - DOI
    1. Bastos A. M., Schoffelen J.-M. (2016). A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 1–23. 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bathelt J., O'Reilly H., Clayden J. D., Cross J. H., De Haan M. (2013). Functional Brain Network Organisation of Children between 2 and 5years Derived from Reconstructed Activity of Cortical Sources of High-Density EEG Recordings. Neuroimage 82, 595–604. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellantuono L., Marzano L., La Rocca M., Duncan D., Lombardi A., Maggipinto T., et al. (2021). Predicting Brain Age with Complex Networks: From Adolescence to Adulthood. Neuroimage 225, 117458. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117458 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berchicci M., Tamburro G., Comani S. (2015). The Intrahemispheric Functional Properties of the Developing Sensorimotor Cortex Are Influenced by Maturation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 39. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed