Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 25:7:1.
doi: 10.21037/med-22-33. eCollection 2023.

Esophageal duplication cysts: a clinical practice review

Affiliations
Review

Esophageal duplication cysts: a clinical practice review

Jessica E Wahi et al. Mediastinum. .

Abstract

Esophageal duplication represents one of the most common types of bronchopulmonary foregut malformations. These rare congenital anomalies occur secondary to embryological aberrations between the 4th and 8th weeks of gestation. In order to be classified as an esophageal cyst a mediastinal cyst must have a close proximity with the esophagus, be lined by alimentary (squamous epithelium) or tracheobronchial mucosa and covered by two smooth muscle layers. These rare anomalies are often asymptomatic during adulthood. However, they can cause symptoms in early childhood, generally during the first 2 years of life. Variations in location, size, presence or absence of heterotopic mucosa, will dictate the clinical presentation. Dysphagia, food impaction, persistent cough and chest pain are common clinical presentations. Imaging studies including esophagram, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide key findings to reach the diagnosis. Nonetheless, endoscopic evaluation, particularly endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the most valuable tool to determine whether this lesion is cystic versus solid and or if there are abnormal mucosal findings. Needle biopsies are controversial but can help with drainage and to rule out malignant transformation. Therapeutic options include endoluminal drainage. However, more definitive therapies include surgical excision. Open and minimally invasive (laparoscopic and thoracoscopic) techniques have been demonstrated to be safe and effective at completely removing these lesions. Recently, robotic-assisted resections have gained more attention with case reports and series reporting excellent outcomes.

Keywords: Esophagus; congenital; duplication cyst; thoracic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://med.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/med-22-33/coif). The series “Mediastinal Cysts” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CT axial view demonstrated complex duplication cyst of the esophagus with extrinsic compression of esophageal lumen. CT, computed tomography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Esophagoscopy demonstrating extrinsic compression of the esophageal wall at 35 cm from the incisors with normal appearing mucosa.
Figure 3
Figure 3
EUS with anechoic cystic lesion in direct contact with the esophagus and thickened wall consistent with esophageal duplication cyst. EUS, endoscopic ultrasound.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Robotic port placement for trans-hiatal robotic assisted laparoscopic duplication cyst excision and Dor fundoplication.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Myotomy and cyst enucleation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cyst excision.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Posterior cruroplasty with running non absorbable 0 barbed suture.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Anterior (Dor) fundoplication.

References

    1. Whitaker JA, Deffenbaugh LD, Cooke AR. Esophageal duplication cyst. Case report. Am J Gastroenterol 1980;73:329-32. - PubMed
    1. Arbona JL, Fazzi JG, Mayoral J. Congenital esophageal cysts: case report and review of literature. Am J Gastroenterol 1984;79:177-82. - PubMed
    1. Anderson MC, Silberman WW, Shields TW. Duplications of the alimentary tract in the adult. Arch Surg 1962;85:94-108. 10.1001/archsurg.1962.01310010098014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stern LE, Warner BW. Gastrointestinal duplications. Semin Pediatr Surg 2000;9:135-40. 10.1053/spsu.2000.7565 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ildstad ST, Tollerud DJ, Weiss RG, et al. Duplications of the alimentary tract. Clinical characteristics, preferred treatment, and associated malformations. Ann Surg 1988;208:184-9. 10.1097/00000658-198808000-00009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed