Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 16;21(1):99.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02819-5.

Exploring preconception signatures of metabolites in mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus using a non-targeted approach

Affiliations

Exploring preconception signatures of metabolites in mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus using a non-targeted approach

Ling-Jun Li et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Metabolomic changes during pregnancy have been suggested to underlie the etiology of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, research on metabolites during preconception is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate distinctive metabolites during the preconception phase between GDM and non-GDM controls in a nested case-control study in Singapore.

Methods: Within a Singapore preconception cohort, we included 33 Chinese pregnant women diagnosed with GDM according to the IADPSG criteria between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. We then matched them with 33 non-GDM Chinese women by age and pre-pregnancy body mass index (ppBMI) within the same cohort. We performed a non-targeted metabolomics approach using fasting serum samples collected within 12 months prior to conception. We used generalized linear mixed model to identify metabolites associated with GDM at preconception after adjusting for maternal age and ppBMI. After annotation and multiple testing, we explored the additional predictive value of novel signatures of preconception metabolites in terms of GDM diagnosis.

Results: A total of 57 metabolites were significantly associated with GDM, and eight phosphatidylethanolamines were annotated using HMDB. After multiple testing corrections and sensitivity analysis, phosphatidylethanolamines 36:4 (mean difference β: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.11) and 38:6 (β: 0.06; 0.004, 0.11) remained significantly higher in GDM subjects, compared with non-GDM controls. With all preconception signals of phosphatidylethanolamines in addition to traditional risk factors (e.g., maternal age and ppBMI), the predictive value measured by area under the curve (AUC) increased from 0.620 to 0.843.

Conclusions: Our data identified distinctive signatures of GDM-associated preconception phosphatidylethanolamines, which is of potential value to understand the etiology of GDM as early as in the preconception phase. Future studies with larger sample sizes among alternative populations are warranted to validate the associations of these signatures of metabolites and their predictive value in GDM.

Keywords: Gestational diabetes mellitus; Lipids; Metabolites; Non-targeted metabolomics; Phosphatidylethanolamines; Preconception; Prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatter plots and box plots of phosphatidylethanolamines 36:4 and 38:6 at preconception (within 12 months prior to conception) phase between GDM and non-GDM controls in the nested case–control study embedded in SPRESTO study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve admissions of the predictive models on GDM using identified metabolites and traditional risks. The red line represents the ROC curve of model 3: GDM ~ all traditional maternal risk factors including maternal age, ppBMI, family history of diabetes, prior history of GDM, preconception prediabetes and parity at the preconception phase (R2 = 0.048, AUC = 0.620). The yellow line represents the ROC curve of model 5: GDM ~ all eight metabolites identified at preconception in addition to model 3 (R2 = 0.377, AUC = 0.843)

References

    1. Catalano PM. Trying to understand gestational diabetes. Diabet Med. 2014;31(3):273–281. doi: 10.1111/dme.12381. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0699-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McIntyre HD, Catalano P, Zhang C, Desoye G, Mathiesen ER, Damm P. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0098-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchanan TA. Pancreatic B-cell defects in gestational diabetes: implications for the pathogenesis and prevention of type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(3):989–993. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.3.7339. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li LJ, Huang L, Tobias DK, Zhang C. Gestational diabetes mellitus among asians - a systematic review from a population health perspective. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;13:840331. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.840331. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources