Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Aug;33(8):5675-5684.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09541-z. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in medical staff: trends during the 2009-2019 period in a multicentric study

Clémence Baudin  1 , Blandine Vacquier  2 , Guillemette Thin  3 , Lamine Chenene  4 , Joël Guersen  5 , Isabelle Partarrieu  2 , Martine Louet  6 , Hubert Ducou Le Pointe  5 , Stéphanie Mora  2 , Catherine Verdun-Esquer  2 , Juliette Feuardent  7 , Frédéric Rousseau  7 , Hervé Roy  7 , Lynda Bensefa-Colas  4 , Louis Boyer  5 , Marie-Odile Bernier  8
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in medical staff: trends during the 2009-2019 period in a multicentric study

Clémence Baudin et al. Eur Radiol. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Health workers exposed to ionizing radiation account for + 50% of workers exposed to man-made radiation in France. Over the last decade, the use of radiation in medicine has increased due to the introduction of new practices. The EXposition des Professionnels de santE aux RayonnemenTs ioniSants study aims to evaluate and characterize the trends in radiation exposure of health workers in France between 2009 and 2019.

Methods: This retrospective study includes all health workers with at least one dosimetric record in the system for occupational dosimetry registration (Système d'information de la surveillance de l'exposition aux rayonnements ionisants) database for each of the years 2009, 2014, and 2019, in the hospitals included in the study. Individual external doses and socio-professional data were collected. Statistical analyses include descriptions, graphs, and logistic regressions.

Results: A total of 1457 workers were included (mean age: 39.8 years, 59% women). The average exposure significantly decreased between 2009 and 2019 (-0.008 mSv/year, p < 0.05). There were large discrepancies in trends according to professions, departments, hospitals, and gender. Over the 10-year study period, radiologic technologists and physicians were the most exposed (0.15 mSv (95%CI 0.14-0.16) and 0.13 mSv (0.06-0.21), respectively), but their exposure tended to decrease. Workers in nuclear medicine departments had the highest radiation exposure (0.36 mSv (0.33-0.39)), which remained stable over time. Thirty-eight percent of recorded doses were nonzero in 2009, decreasing to 20% in 2019.

Conclusions: This study allowed to identify physicians and radiologic technologists in nuclear medicine departments as the most exposed medical workers in France, and to show an overall decrease trend in radiation exposure. This should be instructive for radiation monitoring and safety of exposed medical workers.

Key points: • Radiation exposure of healthcare workers in most medical departments has steadily decreased between 2009 and 2019 in several French hospitals. • The number of zero doses consistently increased during the study period. • Workers in nuclear medicine departments are the most exposed, especially radiologic technologists and physicians.

Keywords: Medical staff; Occupational exposure; Radiation, ionizing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trends in AMD (A) and in nonzero dose percentage (B) over the 2009–2019 period according to the department
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trends in AMD (A) and in nonzero dose percentage (B) over the 2009–2019 period according to the profession
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Trends in AMD (A) and in nonzero dose percentage (B) over the 2009–2019 period according to the age at inclusion
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Trend in the number of doses equal or greater than the dose in 2009 corresponding to the 75th percentile of the study population (0.10 mSv)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO (2022) Ionizing radiation, health effects and protective measures. Available via https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ionizing-radiation-heal.... Accessed 20 Mar 2020
    1. ICPR (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 37:1–332 - PubMed
    1. Rajaraman P, Doody MM, Yu CL et al (2016) Cancer risks in U.S. radiologic technologists working with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures, 1994–2008. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 206:1101–1108; quiz 1109 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chartier H, Fassier P, Leuraud K, et al. Occupational low-dose irradiation and cancer risk among medical radiation workers. Occup Med (Lond) 2020;70:476–484. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284 - PubMed

Publication types