Racial justice in psycholegal research and forensic psychology practice: Current advances and a framework for future progress
- PMID: 36931845
- DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000526
Racial justice in psycholegal research and forensic psychology practice: Current advances and a framework for future progress
Abstract
Police killings of Black civilians have brought unprecedented attention to racial and ethnic discrimination in the criminal justice and legal systems. However, these topics have been underexamined in the field of law-psychology, both in research and forensic-clinical practice. We discuss how a racial justice framework can provide guidance for advancing psycholegal research and forensic-clinical practice related to race, ethnicity, culture, and their intersections. A racial justice framework centers the goal of increasing fair and responsive treatment and just outcomes for the most vulnerable populations involved with the criminal justice, legal, and carceral systems and ending existing disparities. We argue that the framework should include the use of transparent nonobjectivity, in which racial justice is an explicit and acknowledged goal of research and practice that exists alongside a commitment to open and rigorous science and evidence-based practice. We then use the racial justice framework as a backdrop for discussing the articles and broader themes that appear in the special issue, which include racial biases in policing, public views of the police and use of force, expanding research on racial bias in lay judgments, understanding disparities in sentencing and corrections, and improving forensic practice. Finally, we look to the future, discussing practices and perspectives that can facilitate a racial justice approach in psycholegal research and forensic-clinical practice. Our recommendations include engaging in reflexivity and addressing positionality; expanding research questions and methods, especially qualitative and community-based participatory action research; centering and engaging with communities of color; greater emphasis on intersectionality; shifting toward structural and adaptive interventions; and greater integration of work from other fields. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Differing Perceptions of Criminal Justice and Views of Law Enforcement: A Cluster-Analytic Approach to Racial-Ethnic Identities.Psychol Rep. 2023 Oct 31:332941231211504. doi: 10.1177/00332941231211504. Online ahead of print. Psychol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37905411
-
The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Effective Law Enforcement.Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015 Dec;16(3):75-109. doi: 10.1177/1529100615617791. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015. PMID: 26635334
-
Police, courts, and corrections: Experiences of procedural injustice among Black adults.Am J Community Psychol. 2023 Mar;71(1-2):147-157. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12631. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Am J Community Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36378576
-
A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems.Law Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;46(6):398-414. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000510. Law Hum Behav. 2022. PMID: 36521112 Review.
-
The Factors that Motivate Law Enforcement's Use of Force: A Systematic Review.Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Mar;67(1-2):142-151. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12460. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Am J Community Psychol. 2021. PMID: 32885851
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources