A scoping review of empirical research on prescription drug promotion
- PMID: 36931982
- DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.02.012
A scoping review of empirical research on prescription drug promotion
Abstract
Background: Pharmaceutical spending on prescription drug promotion is considerable, and exposure to advertising can influence demand and behavior. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides industry guidance to help ensure that communications to consumers and health care providers about prescription drug promotion are truthful, balanced, and accurately communicated. As empirical research has accelerated on this topic in the past decade, an understanding of the current landscape of the science will help inform future research.
Objectives: Using systematic methods, this rigorous scoping review of the literature over the past decade (2012-2021) (1) examined the extent to which prescription drug promotion has been empirically investigated with consumers, patients, and health care providers; (2) examined the extent to which content and features of prescription drug promotion have been empirically investigated; and (3) identified themes across the literature to better understand the current landscape of prescription drug promotion.
Methods: Databases searched include PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Business Source Corporate, Communication Source, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for original research published in English from January 1, 2012, through November 10, 2021, using terms related to direct-to-consumer advertising, prescription drugs, and outcomes of interest (e.g., attitudes, perceptions, intentions, behaviors).
Results: Of 804 screened references, 151 studies addressed the first research question, and 40 studies addressed the second. The most common theme across the body of evidence focused on testing of features and content in prescription drug promotional materials (84), followed by studies examining attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors toward prescription drug promotion more generally (43). Some (27) studies focused on targeted populations, such as patients, the elderly, non-English speaking people or individuals of a non-white race/ethnicity. Twenty-four studies assessed influence of exposure to prescription drug promotion on actual clinical outcomes, while 11 studies examined emerging technologies around prescription drug promotion. Seven studies evaluated the extent to which prescription drug promotion complied with existing guidelines and requirements.
Conclusions: Findings from this scoping review suggest there has been an increase in the number of empirical studies conducted on prescription drug promotion over the past decade. Potential areas that warrant further study include examination of emerging technologies, an expanded focus on targeted populations, and construct measurement.
Keywords: Advertising; Prescription drug; Promotion; Scoping review.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Medical Marketing in the United States, 1997-2016.JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):80-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19320. JAMA. 2019. PMID: 30620375
-
What influences healthcare providers' prescribing decisions? Results from a national survey.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Oct;17(10):1770-1779. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Jan 28. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021. PMID: 33558154
-
A Legislative/Legal History of Prescription Drug Advertising and Promotion Regulation.J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2021;24:381-389. doi: 10.18433/jpps32138. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2021. PMID: 34314671 Review.
-
Direct-to-consumer promotion of prescription drugs. Economic implications for patients, payers and providers.Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(2):109-19. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119020-00001. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001. PMID: 11284378 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous