Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;27(5):2207-2220.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04941-3. Epub 2023 Mar 18.

Flexural strength, surface roughness, micro-CT analysis, and microbiological adhesion of a 3D-printed temporary crown material

Affiliations

Flexural strength, surface roughness, micro-CT analysis, and microbiological adhesion of a 3D-printed temporary crown material

Anne Kaline Claudino Ribeiro et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the thermocycling effect of 3D-printed resins on flexural strength, surface roughness, microbiological adhesion, and porosity.

Materials and methods: 150 bars (8 × 2 × 2 mm) and 100 blocks (8 × 8 × 2 mm) were made and divided into 5 groups, according to two factors: "material" (AR: acrylic resin, CR: composite resin, BIS: bis-acryl resin, CAD: CAD/CAM resin, and PRINT: 3D-printed resin) and "aging" (non-aged and aged - TC). Half of them were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles). The bars were subjected to mini-flexural strength (σ) test (1 mm/min). All the blocks were subjected to roughness analysis (Ra/Rq/Rz). The non-aged blocks were subjected to porosity analysis (micro-CT; n = 5) and fungal adherence (n = 10). Data were statistically analyzed (one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA; Tukey's test, α = 0.05).

Results: For σ, "material" and "aging" factors were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The BIS (118.23 ± 16.26A) presented a higher σ and the PRINT group (49.87 ± 7.55E) had the lowest mean σ. All groups showed a decrease in σ after TC, except for PRINT. The CRTC showed the lowest Weibull modulus. The AR showed higher roughness than BIS. Porosity revealed that the AR (1.369%) and BIS (6.339%) presented the highest porosity, and the CAD (0.002%) had the lowest porosity. Cell adhesion was significantly different between the CR (6.81) and CAD (6.37).

Conclusion: Thermocycling reduced the flexural strength of most provisional materials, except for 3D-printed resin. However, it did not influence the surface roughness. The CR showed higher microbiological adherence than CAD group. The BIS group reached the highest porosity while the CAD group had the lowest values.

Clinical relevance: 3D-printed resins are promising materials for clinical applications because they have good mechanical properties and low fungal adhesion.

Keywords: 3D-printed resin; Aging; Biofilm; CAD-CAM; Flexural strength; Provisional material.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Specimen preparation and obtaining of the mini bars from the silicone mold. AR acrylic resin, BIS bis-acryl, CR composite resin, CAD CAD/CAM resin, and PRINT 3D-printed resin. Graphic abstract elaborated by the authors
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of the study design
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Weibull plot for flexural strength
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Micro-CT analysis of two-dimensional images for the resin groups. A Acrylic resin (AR), B composite resin (CR), C bis-acryl resin (BIS), D CAD-CAM resin, and E print resin (PRINT). The porous in the specimen showed radiolucent areas similar to the black arrows. The cerium nitrate appear as radiolucent areas similar to the black arrows. The cerium nitrate appear as radiopaque areas similar to the white arrows
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean log (CFU/mL) of Candida albicans (ATCC90028) cultivated on the specimens (mean and SD). *Different lowercase indicated statistically significance (p < 0.05; ANOVA, Turkey)

References

    1. Gratton DG, Aquilino SA (2004) Interim restorations. Dent Clin North Am 48:487–497. 10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abad-Coronel C, Carrera E, Mena Córdova N, Fajardo JI, Aliaga P (2021) Comparative analysis of fracture resistance between CAD/CAM materials for interim fixed prosthesis. Materials (Basel) 14:7791. 10.3390/ma14247791 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saisadan D, Manimaran P, Meenapriya PK (2016) In vitro comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of temporary restorative materials used in fixed partial denture. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 8:S105–S109. 10.4103/0975-7406.191936 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miura S, Fujisawa M, Komine F, Maseki T, Ogawa T, Takebe J, Nara Y (2019) Importance of interim restorations in the molar region. J Oral Sci 61:195–199. 10.2334/josnusd.19-0102 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peng CC, Chung KH, Ramos V Jr, (2020) Assessment of the adaptation of interim crowns using different measurement techniques. J Prosthodont 29:87–93. 10.1111/jopr.13122 - DOI - PubMed