Top-down modulation of brain responses in spelling error recognition
- PMID: 36933384
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103891
Top-down modulation of brain responses in spelling error recognition
Abstract
The task being undertaken can influence orthographic, phonological and semantic processes. In linguistic research, two tasks are most often used: a task requiring a decision in relation to the presented word and a passive reading task which does not require a decision regarding the presented word. The results of studies using these different tasks are not always consistent. This study aimed to explore brain responses associated with the process of recognition of spelling errors, as well as the influence of the task on this process. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in 40 adults during an orthographic decision task to determine correctly spelled words and words written with errors that did not change the phonology and during the passive reading. During spelling recognition, the early stages up to 100 ms after the stimulus were automatic and did not depend on the requirements of the task. The amplitude of the N1 component (90-160 ms) was greater in the orthographic decision task, but did not depend on the correct spelling of the word. Late word recognition after 350-500 ms was task dependent, but spelling effects were similar across the two tasks: misspelled words evoked an increase in the amplitude of the N400 component related to lexical and semantic processing regardless of the task. In addition, the orthographic decision task modulated spelling effects, this was reflected in an increase in the amplitude of the P2 component (180-260 ms) for correctly spelled words compared with misspelled words. Thus, our results show that spelling recognition involves general lexico-semantic processes independent of the task. Simultaneously, the orthographic decision task modulates the spelling-specific processes necessary to quickly detect conflicts between orthographic and phonological representations of words in memory.
Keywords: ERP; Orthographic decision; Reading; Spelling; Top-down control; Visual word recognition.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Electrophysiological signatures of spelling sensitivity development from primary school age to adulthood.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 30;14(1):7585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58219-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38555413 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency Effects on Spelling Error Recognition: An ERP Study.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 14;13:834852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834852. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35496180 Free PMC article.
-
Interplay of phonological and orthographic electrophysiological processing during reading in Spanish.Int J Psychophysiol. 2025 May;211:112550. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112550. Epub 2025 Mar 5. Int J Psychophysiol. 2025. PMID: 40054775
-
Electrophysiological studies of visual word perception, lexical organization, and semantic processing: a tutorial review.Lang Speech. 1989 Jul-Sep;32 ( Pt 3):205-20. doi: 10.1177/002383098903200302. Lang Speech. 1989. PMID: 2701178 Review.
-
New insights into bilingual visual word recognition: State of the art on the role of orthographic markedness, its theoretical implications, and future research directions.Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):1032-1056. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02347-6. Epub 2023 Dec 1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 38040878 Review.
Cited by
-
Electrophysiological signatures of spelling sensitivity development from primary school age to adulthood.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 30;14(1):7585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58219-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38555413 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources