Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;66(1):54-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Quality Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Modified Delphi Process With Patients, Family Members, and Clinicians

Jennifer W Mack  1 , Lauren Fisher  2 , Andrew Khalaj  2 , Andrea Altschuler  3 , Chun R Chao  4 , Lawrence H Kushi  5 , Mallory Casperson  6 , Joshua R Lakin  7 , Anna Lefebvre  8 , Corey M Schwartz  9 , Dov M Shalman  10 , Catherine B Wall  8 , Lori Wiener  11
Affiliations

Quality Indicators for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Modified Delphi Process With Patients, Family Members, and Clinicians

Jennifer W Mack et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Context: Quality measures have been devised for end-of-life care of older adults with cancer, but are lacking for adolescents and young adults (AYAs).

Objective: We previously conducted interviews with AYAs, family caregivers, and clinicians to identify priority domains for high quality care of AYAs with advanced cancer. The goal of this study was to use a modified Delphi process to form consensus around the highest priority quality indicators.

Methods: A modified Delphi process was conducted with 10 AYAs with recurrent or metastatic cancer, 11 family caregivers, and 29 multidisciplinary clinicians, using small group web conferences. Participants were asked to rate the importance of each of 41 potential quality indicators, rank the 10 most important, and engage in discussion to reconcile differences.

Results: Of 41 initial indicators, 34 were rated as highly important (rating seven, eight, or nine on a nine-point scale) by >70% of participants. The panel was unable to reach consensus around the 10 most important indicators. Instead, participants recommended retaining a larger set of indicators to reflect potential for different priorities across the population, resulting in a final set of 32 indicators. Recommended indicators broadly encompassed attention to physical symptoms; quality of life; psychosocial, and spiritual care; communication and decision-making; relationships with clinicians; care and treatment; and independence.

Conclusion: A patient- and family-centered process for quality indicator development led to strong endorsement of multiple potential indicators by Delphi participants. Further validation and refinement will be performed using a survey of bereaved family members.

Keywords: Adolescent; end-of-life; quality; young adult.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Delphi process for AYAs with advanced cancer, family caregivers, and clinicians.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bleyer A. The adolescent and young adult gap in cancer care and outcome. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2005;35(5):182–217. - PubMed
    1. Cancer Epidemiology in Older Adolescents and Young Adults 15 to 29 Years of Age, Including SEER Incidence and Survival: 1975–2000 Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, NIH; 2006.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2022;72(1):7–33. - PubMed
    1. Mack JW, Chen K, Boscoe FP, et al. High Intensity of End-of-Life Care Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients in the New York State Medicaid Program. Med Care. 2015;53(12):1018–1026. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mack JW, Chen LH, Cannavale K, Sattayapiwat O, Cooper RM, Chao CR. End-of-Life Care Intensity Among Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Cancer in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(5):592–600. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types