Nitrogen loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields with the proportion of controlled-release urea and conventional urea rates under alternate wetting and drying irrigation

Abstract

Alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD) can reduce non-point source pollution from paddy fields by mitigating field water depth. However, the influence of compounding modes of polymer-coated urea (PCU) and conventional urea (CU) on nitrogen (N) loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields under AWD conditions remains unclear. To address this question, in this study, a 2-year field experiment was set up with three N management treatments: (a) 100% CU (N1), (b) 60% PCU + 40% CU (N2), and (c) 100% PCU (N3), at an equivalent N rate of 240 kg ha^-1 that was applied to traditional continuously flooded (CI) and AWD systems. The results of this experiment showed a high-risk period of N loss from the paddy fields within 7 d after basal fertilization and 5 days after tillering fertilization. AWD reduced irrigation frequencies by 3.5 times and total input of irrigation water by 38.1%, increasing water utilization from precipitation by 44.4% than CI and reducing the volume of runoff by 46.1% and leaching water by 22.1%. This reduced the total N (TN) loss through runoff and leaching under AWD. In the N2 and N3 treatment groups, N concentration in floodwater decreased from 33.8 to 24.9%, TN loss via runoff decreased by 35.3 to 25.0%, and leaching decreased by 41.7 to 30.3% from the paddy field compared to N1. With the same N mode, AWD showed a higher N uptake (from jointing to maturity stage) and rice yield compared to CI. Besides, N2 and N3 had higher N uptake compared to N1 under the two irrigation regimes. Moreover, the AWDN3 and AWDN2 treatments resulted in the lowest and second-lowest loss of TN via runoff (2.21 to 2.66 kg ha^-1) and leaching (8.14 and 10.21 kg ha^-1), respectively, from the paddy fields and had the relatively high N uptake in rice in the maturity stage. Remarkably, compared with N3, N2 had a comparable grain yield under CI; however, it showed a higher yield under AWD, suggesting that there is a positive interaction in the rice yield between the AWD and compounding N (PCU + CU) fertilization practice. Thus, AWD coupled with N2 could be recommended as a useful approach to reduce N loss via runoff and leaching from paddy fields, which could increase the grain yield of middle-season rice.

Keywords: Controlled-release fertilizer; Grain yield; Nitrogen accumulation; Nitrogen loss; Precipitation utilization.