Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;1(1):e000017.
doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000017. eCollection 2022.

Dose-response effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of depression: systematic review of reviews and meta-narrative synthesis

Affiliations

Dose-response effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of depression: systematic review of reviews and meta-narrative synthesis

Chris F Johnson et al. BMJ Med. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess and clarify the relations between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) dose efficacy, acceptability (early treatment discontinuation (dropouts)), and tolerability (reported adverse drug effects), and critically evaluate methods previously used to examine SSRI dose-response effects for the treatment of depression in adults.

Design: Systematic review of reviews and meta-narrative synthesis.

Data sources: Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration library, from 1975 to December 2021. Reference lists of national depression treatment guidelines were systemically searched by hand.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Reviews assessing SSRI monotherapy dose-response effects for the treatment of depression in adults (age ≥18 years) reporting efficacy, acceptability, or tolerability. Reviews meeting inclusion criteria had a high degree of heterogeneity, due to methodological diversity; therefore, a meta-narrative synthesis approach was applied. Standard daily doses were defined as 20 mg citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine; 50 mg sertraline; and 10 mg escitalopram. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool, in line with Cochrane recommendations.

Results: The search identified 9138 records; 387 full text reports were assessed for eligibility, 42 of which matched the inclusion criteria. The majority, 83% (n=35), of reviews included data for studies with a duration of ≤12 weeks (ie, the acute phase of depression treatment). Of 39 reviews assessing efficacy, the majority (n=26) indicated that individual SSRIs and SSRI class demonstrated flat dose-response effects; standard doses were optimal for efficacy. Acceptability or tolerability were assessed in 28 reviews. Higher than standard daily doses were associated with higher dropout rates and a greater incidence of adverse drug effects (eg, nausea, sexual dysfunction, fatigue, anxiety). Despite a range of methods being reported, there was an overall consensus regarding SSRI dose related efficacy, dropouts, and adverse drug effects.

Conclusion: Standard daily doses of SSRIs for the treatment of depression in adults provide a favourable balance between efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability. Patients are encouraged to talk to their prescriber or community pharmacist if they experience adverse effects or have any concerns about their drug treatments.

Keywords: Mood disorders; Pharmacology; Psychiatry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and the Pharmacy and Prescribing Support Unit Endowment fund for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Review identification, inclusion, and exclusion. *Total records identified include combined records from Embase, Medline, and PsychInfo (n=8728), plus those from Scopus and Cochrane. †Number of records listed are those identified from each database (rather than the total number across all databases). ‡No automated tools used, as per PRISMA 2020 guideline. SSRI=selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; ADE=adverse drug effect
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROBIS (risk of bias in systematic reviews) assessment of all 42 reviews meeting inclusion criteria. First four columns relate to judgments; last column relates to overall rating for risk of bias
Figure 3
Figure 3
Corrected covered area pairwise matrix of primary studies citations. Pairwise analysis of review citations assessed as being at low risk of bias. Overlap categorisation: slight (0-5%; white), moderate (6-10%), high (11-15%; yellow), very high (>15%; red)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Taylor S, Annand F, Burkinshaw P. Dependence and withdrawal associated with some prescribed medicines: an evidence review. London: Public Health England, 2019.
    1. Chen Y, Kelton CML, Jing Y, et al. . Utilization, price, and spending trends for antidepressants in the US Medicaid program. Res Social Adm Pharm 2008;4:244–57. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.06.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stephenson CP, Karanges E, McGregor IS. Trends in the utilisation of psychotropic medications in Australia from 2000 to 2011. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2013;47:74–87. 10.1177/0004867412466595 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ISD Scotland . Medicines used in mental health: 2009/10 to 2018/19: information services division Scotland, 2019. Available: https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Prescribing-and-Medicines/Publ...
    1. Johnson CF, Macdonald HJ, Atkinson P, et al. . Reviewing long-term antidepressants can reduce drug burden: a prospective observational cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2012;62:e773–9. 10.3399/bjgp12X658304 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources