Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 2:13:1075593.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1075593. eCollection 2023.

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of antibiotic use on the clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Affiliations

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of antibiotic use on the clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Athéna Crespin et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have considerably improved patient outcomes in various cancer types, but their efficacy remains poorly predictable among patients. The intestinal microbiome, whose balance and composition can be significantly altered by antibiotic use, has recently emerged as a factor that may modulate ICI efficacy. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the impact of antibiotics on the clinical outcomes of cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Methods: PubMed and major oncology conference proceedings were systematically searched to identify all studies reporting associations between antibiotic use and at least one of the following endpoints: Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Progressive Disease (PD) Rate. Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS, and pooled Odds Ratios (ORs) for ORR and PD were calculated. Subgroup analyses on survival outcomes were also performed to investigate the potential differential effect of antibiotics according to cancer types and antibiotic exposure time windows.

Results: 107 articles reporting data for 123 independent cohorts were included, representing a total of 41,663 patients among whom 11,785 (28%) received antibiotics around ICI initiation. The pooled HRs for OS and PFS were respectively of 1.61 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.48-1.76] and 1.45 [95% CI 1.32-1.60], confirming that antibiotic use was significantly associated with shorter survival. This negative association was observed consistently across all cancer types for OS and depending on the cancer type for PFS. The loss of survival was particularly strong when antibiotics were received shortly before or after ICI initiation. The pooled ORs for ORR and PD were respectively of 0.59 [95% CI 0.47-0.76] and 1.86 [95% CI 1.41-2.46], suggesting that antibiotic use was significantly associated with worse treatment-related outcomes.

Conclusion: As it is not ethically feasible to conduct interventional, randomized, controlled trials in which antibiotics would be administered to cancer patients treated with ICIs to demonstrate their deleterious impact versus control, prospective observational studies and interventional trials involving microbiome modifiers are crucially needed to uncover the role of microbiome and improve patient outcomes. Such studies will reduce the existing publication bias by allowing analyses on more homogeneous populations, especially in terms of treatments received, which is not possible at this stage given the current state of the field. In the meantime, antibiotic prescription should be cautiously considered in cancer patients receiving ICIs.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42019145675.

Keywords: antibiotics; cancer; immune checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapies; meta-analysis; microbiome; microbiota; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that this study received funding from Da Volterra, France. The funder was involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, and the decision to submit it for publication. AC, FV, and JC are employees of Da Volterra. CL and P-AB are employees of Da Volterra and may have owned or received shares of Da Volterra, during the study period. JG and GZ are consultants for Da Volterra and report receiving consulting fees from Da Volterra. JG reports having owned shares of Da Volterra, during the study period. GZ reports having received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from ROCHE; personal fees from MSD; personal fees and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inventiva, Sanofi-Regeneron and Astra-Zeneca Pharmaceuticals; and non-financial support from Pfizer, AbbVie, and Da Volterra, outside of the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature query used on PubMed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the search process. AACR, American Association for Cancer Research; ASCO, American Society of Clinical Oncology; ELCC, European Lung Cancer Congress; ESMO, European Society for Medical Oncology; IASCL, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer; SITC, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer; WCLC, World Conference on Lung Cancer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of hazard ratios for overall survival of patients diagnosed with cancer exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; M, Multivariate; N/A, Not Available; TW, Time Window; U, Univariate; U*, Univariate, HR estimated from Kaplan-Meier curve.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of hazard ratios for progression-free survival of patients diagnosed with cancer exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; M, Multivariate; N/A, Not Available; TW, Time Window; U, Univariate; U*, Univariate, HR estimated from Kaplan-Meier curve.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of hazard ratios yielded from multivariate analyses for overall survival of patients diagnosed with cancer exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; TW, Time Window.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of hazard ratios yielded from multivariate analyses for progression-free survival of patients diagnosed with cancer exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; N/A, Not Available; TW, Time Window.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of odds ratios of the overall response rate of patients diagnosed with cancer and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; OR, Odds Ratio; Response, Complete or Partial Response. *The OR value from multivariate analyses was available for this study and therefore used as such in the meta-analysis.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot of odds ratios of the progressive disease rate of patients diagnosed with cancer and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; CSCC, Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma; OR, Odds Ratio; Progression, Cancer progression. *The OR value from multivariate analyses was available for this study and therefore used as such in the meta-analysis.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Forest plot of hazard ratios for overall survival of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation, according to the antibiotic exposure time window. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; M, Multivariate; N/A, Not Available; TW, Time Window; U, Univariate; U*, Univariate, HR estimated from Kaplan-Meier curve.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Forest plot of hazard ratios for progression-free survival of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation, according to the antibiotic exposure time window. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; M, Multivariate; N/A, Not Available; TW, Time Window; U, Univariate; U*, Univariate, HR estimated from Kaplan-Meier curve.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Forest plot of odds ratios of the overall response rate of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; OR, Odds Ratio; Response, Complete or Partial Response. *The OR value from multivariate analyses was available for this study and therefore used as such in the meta-analysis.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Forest plot of odds ratios of the progressive disease rate of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics around immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment initiation. ABX, Antibiotic; CI, Confidence Interval; OR, Odds Ratio; Progression, Cancer progression.

References

    1. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science (2018) 359:1350–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4060 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Das S, Johnson DB. Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer (2019) 7:306. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0805-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazieres J, Drilon A, Lusque A, Mhanna L, Cortot AB, Mezquita L, et al. . Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry. Ann Oncol (2019) 30:1321–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz167 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lo Russo G, Moro M, Sommariva M, Cancila V, Boeri M, Centonze G, et al. . Antibody-Fc/FcR interaction on macrophages as a mechanism for hyperprogressive disease in non-small cell lung cancer subsequent to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Clin Cancer Res (2019) 25:989–99. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1390 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res (2020) 30:492–506. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types