Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 14:10:20499361231161157.
doi: 10.1177/20499361231161157. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Anti-G protein antibodies targeting the RSV G protein CX3C chemokine region improve the interferon response

Affiliations

Anti-G protein antibodies targeting the RSV G protein CX3C chemokine region improve the interferon response

Harrison C Bergeron et al. Ther Adv Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a poor inducer of antiviral interferon (IFN) responses which result in incomplete immunity and RSV disease. Several RSV proteins alter antiviral responses, including the non-structural proteins (NS1, NS2) and the major viral surface proteins, that is, fusion (F) and attachment (G) proteins. The G protein modifies the host immune response to infection linked in part through a CX3 C chemokine motif. Anti-G protein monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), that is, clones 3D3 and 2D10 that target the G protein CX3C chemokine motif can neutralize RSV and inhibit G protein-CX3CR1 mediated chemotaxis.

Objectives: Determine how monoclonal antibodies against the RSV F and G proteins modify the type I and III IFN responses to RSV infection.

Design: As the G protein CX3 C motif is implicated in IFN antagonism, we evaluated two mAbs that block G protein CX3C-CX3CR1 interaction and compared responses to isotype mAb control using a functional cellular assay and mouse model.

Methods: Mouse lung epithelial cells (MLE-15 cells) and BALB/c mice were infected with RSV Line19 F following prophylactic mAb treatment. Cell supernatant or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were assayed for types I and III IFNs. Cells were interrogated for changes in IFN-related gene expression.

Results: Treatment with an anti-G protein mAb (3D3) resulted in improved IFN responses compared with isotype control following infection with RSV, partially independently of neutralization, and this was linked to upregulated SOCS1 expression.

Conclusions: These findings show that anti-G protein antibodies improve the protective early antiviral response, which has important implications for vaccine and therapeutic design.

Plain language summary: RSV is a leading cause of respiratory disease in infants and the elderly. The only Food and Drug Administration-approved prophylactic treatment is limited to an anti-F protein monoclonal antibody (mAb), that is, palivizumab which has modest efficacy against RSV disease. Accumulating evidence suggests that targeting the RSV attachment (G) protein may provide improved protection from RSV disease. It is known that the G protein is an IFN antagonist, and IFN has been shown to be protective against RSV disease. In this study, we compared IFN responses in mouse lung epithelial (MLE-15) cells and in mice infected with RSV Line19 F treated with anti-G protein or anti-F protein mAbs. The levels of type I and III IFNs were determined. Anti-G protein mAbs improved the levels of IFNs compared with isotype-treated controls. These findings support the concept that anti-G protein mAbs mediate improved IFN responses against RSV disease, which may enable improved treatment of RSV infections.

Keywords: F protein; G protein; IFN; ISG; Line19 F; RSV; mAb; monoclonal antibody; palivizumab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: LMK is the founder and chief scientific officer of Trellis Bioscience.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Anti-G protein mAbs are non-neutralizing in vitro but neutralize in mice. (a) RSV Line19 F was pre-incubated with 10 μg/mL mAb for 1 h at 37°C then added onto MLE-15 cells for 24 h. (b) BALB/c mice were i.p. treated prophylactically with 1 mg/kg of indicated mAb 24 h before i.n. infection with 106 PFU Line19 F. Twenty-four hours post infection, genome equivalent units (GEs) were determined in MLE-15 cells and homogenized mouse lung using a standard curve as described in materials and methods. (c) RSV Line19 F was pre-incubated with 10 μg/mL mAb for 1 h at 37°C then added onto MLE-15 cells for 24 h. After 24 h, plates were scanned using Cellomics Array Scan and fluorescent focus units (FFUs) were enumerated. (d) Viral titers in mouse lungs were determined by plaque assay. ND = not detected. * p < 0.05 as determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test compared with isotype control. Experiments were individually repeated at least twice with technical replicates. Bars represent the mean ± SEM.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
RSV antibodies modify IFNβ responses. (a) RSV Line19 F was pre-incubated with 10 μg/mL mAb for 1 h at 37°C then added onto MLE-15 cells for 24 h and supernatant was assayed for IFNβ concentrations. (b) The BALB/c mice were i.p. treated prophylactically with 1 mg/kg of indicated mAb 24 h before i.n. infection with 106 PFU Line19 F. At 24 hpi, BALF was collected and assayed for IFNβ concentrations. Concentration of IFNβ was determined by ELISA and quantified using a standard curve of IFNβ. Bars represent the mean ± SEM of IFNβ (pg/mL). * p < 0.05 as determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test compared with isotype control. For in vitro, bars represent the mean of three independent studies with technical replicates. For in vivo, bars represent mean of three independent assays with technical replicates from one experiment of 5 mice/group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
RSV antibodies modify type I IFN gene expression. RSV was pre-incubated with 10 μg/mL mAb for 1 h at 37°C then added onto MLE-15 cells for 24 h. Twenty-four hours post infection, expression of (a) IFNA1, (b) IFNB, and (c) ISG15 genes was determined in MLE-15 cells. Bars represent the mean ± SEM of gene expression fold change using ΔΔCt PCR method normalized to ACTB expression and mock-infected cells. *p < 0.05 as determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test compared with isotype control. Experiments were individually repeated at least twice with technical replicates.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
RSV antibodies modify IFNλ2/3 responses. (a) RSV Line19 F was pre-incubated with 10 μg/mL mAb for 1 h at 37°C, then added onto MLE-15 cells for 24 h, and supernatant was assayed for IFNλ2/3. (b) The BALB/c mice were i.p. treated prophylactically with 1 mg/kg of indicated mAb 24 h before i.n. infection with 106 PFU Line19 F. Twenty-four hours post infection, BALF was collected and assayed for IFNλ2/3. Concentration of IFNλ2/3 was determined by ELISA and quantified using a standard curve of IFNλ2/3. Bars represent the mean ± SEM of IFNλ2/3 (pg/mL). *p < 0.05 as determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test compared with isotype control. For in vitro, bars represent the mean of three independent studies with technical replicates. For in vivo, bars represent mean of three independent assays with technical replicates from one experiment of 5 mice/group.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
RSV antibodies modify type III IFN gene expression. RSV Line19 F was pre-incubated with 10 μg/mL mAb for 1 h at 37°C then added onto MLE-15 cells for 24 h. At 24 hpi, the expression of IFNL3 genes was determined in MLE-15 cells. Bars represent the mean ± SEM of gene expression fold change using ΔΔCt PCR method normalized to ACTB expression and mock-infected cells. *p < 0.05 as determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test compared with isotype control. Experiments were individually repeated at least twice with technical replicates.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
RSV antibodies modify the suppression of cytokine signaling (SOCS) gene expression. RSV Line19 F was pre-incubated with 10 μg/mL mAb for 1 h at 37°C, then added onto MLE-15 cells for 24 h. At 24 hpi, expression of (a) SOCS1, (b) SOCS2, and (c) SOCS3 genes was determined in MLE-15 cells. Bars represent the mean ± SEM of gene expression fold change using ΔΔCt PCR method normalized to ACTB expression and mock-infected cells. * p < 0.05 as determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test compared with isotype control. Experiments were individually repeated at least twice with technical replicates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boyoglu-Barnum S, Tripp RA. Up-to-date role of biologics in the management of respiratory syncytial virus. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2020; 20: 1073–1082. - PubMed
    1. Dalziel SR, Haskell L, O’Brien S, et al.. Bronchiolitis. Lancet 2022; 400: 392–406. - PubMed
    1. Georgescu G, Chemaly RF. Palivizumab: where to from here? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2009; 9: 139–147. - PubMed
    1. Bergeron HC, Tripp RA. Emerging small and large molecule therapeutics for respiratory syncytial virus. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2020; 29: 285–294. - PubMed
    1. Tripp RA, Power UF, Openshaw PJM, et al.. Respiratory syncytial virus: targeting the G protein provides a new approach for an old problem. J Virol 2018; 92: e01302-17. - PMC - PubMed