Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 5;136(5):522-527.
doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002582.

Research progress in the application of time in range: more than a percentage

Affiliations

Research progress in the application of time in range: more than a percentage

Jintao Wan et al. Chin Med J (Engl). .

Abstract

Glucose monitoring is an important part of medical care in diabetes mellitus, which not only helps assess glycemic control and treatment safety, but also assists with treatment adjustment. With the development of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), the use of CGM has increased rapidly. With the wealth of glucose data produced by CGM, new metrics are greatly needed to optimally evaluate glucose status and guide the treatment. One of the parameters that CGM provides, time in range (TIR), has been recognized as a key metric by the international consensus. Before the adoption of TIR in clinical practice, several issues including the minimum length of CGM use, the setting of the target range, and individualized TIR goals are summarized. Additionally, we discussed the mounting evidence supporting the association between TIR and diabetes-related outcomes. As a novel glucose metric, it is of interest to compare TIR with other conventional glucose markers such as glycated hemoglobin A1c. It is anticipated that the use of TIR may provide further information on the quality of glucose control and lead to improved diabetes management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

    1. Bao Y, Zhu D. Clinical application guidelines for blood glucose monitoring in China (2022 edition). Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2022; 38:e3581.doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3581. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright LA, Hirsch IB. Metrics beyond hemoglobin A1C in diabetes management: time in range, hypoglycemia, and other parameters. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017; 19:S16–S26. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0029. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck RW, Connor CG, Mullen DM, Wesley DM, Bergenstal RM. The fallacy of average: how using HbA(1c) alone to assess glycemic control can be misleading. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:994–999. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0636. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, Bergenstal RM, Close KL, DeVries JH, et al. . International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:1631–1640. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1600. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, et al. . Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care 2019; 42:1593–1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. - PMC - PubMed