Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;169(1):47-54.
doi: 10.1002/ohn.253. Epub 2023 Jan 29.

Providing Evidence for Dogma: Risk of Epistaxis After COVID-19 Nasal-Screening Swab

Affiliations

Providing Evidence for Dogma: Risk of Epistaxis After COVID-19 Nasal-Screening Swab

Nikolas R Block-Wheeler et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: There is anecdotal evidence SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) RT-PCR screening nasal swabs confer an elevated epistaxis risk. We aimed to assess the association between epistaxis and exposure to a COVID nasal swab.

Study design: A matched pairs design was used.

Setting: The study was performed in a single, integrated health care system.

Methods: All patients who received a single COVID nasal swab at our institution between April 2020 and March 2021 were included. McNemar's test was used to compare rates of epistaxis between the 7 days following the index COVID swab (hazard period), and the 7 days preceding the index COVID swab (control period). Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for epistaxis.

Results: A total of 827,987 participants were included, with 1047 epistaxis encounters. The prevalence of epistaxis during the hazard and control periods were 0.08% and 0.04%, respectively. Swab exposure was associated with 1.92-fold odds of epistaxis during the hazard period (95% confidence interval [1.73, 2.12]). Older age, Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) (compared to white), male sex, hypertension, prior facial trauma, and warfarin or direct-acting oral anticoagulant use were also associated with significantly increased odds of epistaxis (p ≦ 0.01).

Conclusion: COVID nasal swabs are associated with increased odds of epistaxis. Physicians should counsel patients, particularly those at the highest risk, including a history of prior facial trauma, anticoagulants/antiplatelets, or hypertension.

Keywords: COVID test; COVID-19; epistaxis; nasal swab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Davenport C, Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Mateos-Haro M, Berhane S, Dinnes J, Spijker R, Buitrago-Garcia D, Ciapponi A, Takwoingi Y, Deeks JJ, Emperador D, Leeflang MMG, Van den Bruel A; Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Davenport C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39679851 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Womack JP, Kropa J, Jimenez Stabile M. Epistaxis: outpatient management. Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(4):240-245. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30215971
    1. Sethi RKV, Kozin ED, Abt NB, Bergmark R, Gray ST. Treatment disparities in the management of epistaxis in United States emergency departments. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(2):356-362. doi:10.1002/lary.26683
    1. Schlosser RJ. Epistaxis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(8):784-789. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp0807078
    1. National ENT Trainee Research Network. Epistaxis 2016: national audit of management. J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131(12):1131-1141. doi:10.1017/S002221511700202X
    1. Brinjikji W, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. Trends in epistaxis embolization in the United States: a study of the nationwide inpatient sample 2003-2010. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(7):969-973. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.035