Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 20:7:e38563.
doi: 10.2196/38563.

Video Consultations and Safety App Targeting Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence in Denmark and Spain: Nested Cohort Intervention Study (STOP Study)

Karen Andreasen  1   2   3 , Antonella Ludmila Zapata-Calvente  4 , Stella Martín-de-Las-Heras  5 , Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas  6   7 , Berit Schei  1   8   9 , Sarah Dokkedahl  10 , Sabina de León de León  4 , Rodrigo Fernandez Lopez  6 , Alba Oviedo-Gutiérrez  4 , Lea Bo Sønderlund Ankerstjerne  1   2 , Jesús L Megías  4 , Khalid Saeed Khan  6   7 , Vibeke Rasch  1   2 , Ditte S Linde  1   2
Affiliations

Video Consultations and Safety App Targeting Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence in Denmark and Spain: Nested Cohort Intervention Study (STOP Study)

Karen Andreasen et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy is a public health issue with wide-ranging consequences for both the mother and fetus, and interventions are needed. Therefore, the Stop Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy (STOP) cohort was established with the overall aim to identify pregnant women exposed to IPV through digital screening and offer women screening positive for IPV a digital supportive intervention.

Objective: The aim of this study was to (1) introduce the design and profile of the STOP cohort study, (2) assess the feasibility of implementing digital IPV screening among pregnant women, and (3) assess the feasibility of implementing a digital supportive intervention targeting pregnant women exposed to IPV.

Methods: Pregnant women attending antenatal care in the Region of Southern Denmark and in Andalucía, Spain were offered digital screening for IPV using validated scales (Abuse Assessment Screen and Women Abuse Screening Tool). Women who screened positive were eligible to receive a digital supportive intervention. The intervention consisted of 3-6 video consultations with an IPV counselor and a safety planning app. In Denmark, IPV counselors were antenatal care midwives trained by a psychologist specialized in IPV, whereas in Spain, the counselor was a psychologist.

Results: Data collection started in February 2021 and was completed in October 2022. Across Denmark and Spain, a total of 19,442 pregnant women were invited for IPV screening and 16,068 women (82.65%) completed the screening. More women in Spain screened positive for exposure to IPV (350/2055, 17.03%) than in Denmark (1195/14,013, 8.53%). Among the women who screened positive, only 31.39% (485/1545) were eligible to receive the intervention with only 104 (21.4%) of these women ultimately receiving it.

Conclusions: Digital screening for IPV among pregnant women is feasible in an antenatal care context in Denmark and Spain; however, a digital supportive intervention during pregnancy appears to have limited feasibility as only a minor subgroup of women who screened positive for eligibility received the intervention. More research is needed on how to best support pregnant women exposed to IPV if universal IPV screening is to be implemented in antenatal care.

Keywords: abuse; acceptance; app; domestic violence; empowerment; feasibility; gender-based violence; intimate partner violence; safety; telemedicine; video counseling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of the MYPLAN safety app.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the STOP study. IPV: intimate partner violence; WAST: Women Abuse Screening Tool.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jahanfar S, Janssen PA, Howard LM, Dowswell T. Interventions for preventing or reducing domestic violence against pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD009414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009414.pub2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogathi JJ, Manongi R, Mushi D, Rasch V, Sigalla GN, Gammeltoft T, Meyrowitsch DW. Postpartum depression among women who have experienced intimate partner violence: A prospective cohort study at Moshi, Tanzania. J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.063.S0165-0327(16)32265-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tho Tran N, Nguyen HTT, Nguyen HD, Ngo TV, Gammeltoft T, Rasch V, Meyrowitsch DW. Emotional violence exerted by intimate partners and postnatal depressive symptoms among women in Vietnam: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0207108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207108. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207108 PONE-D-17-14202 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halim N, Beard J, Mesic A, Patel A, Henderson D, Hibberd P. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and perinatal mental disorders in low and lower middle income countries: A systematic review of literature, 1990-2017. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Dec;66:117–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.004.S0272-7358(17)30256-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alhusen JL, Ray E, Sharps P, Bullock L. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Womens Health. 2015 Jan;24(1):100–106. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4872. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25265285 - DOI - PMC - PubMed