Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;122(1):15-19.

'The Biggest Problem With Access': Provider Reports of the Effects of Wisconsin 2011 Act 217 Medication Abortion Legislation

Taryn M Valley  1   2 , Meghan Zander  3 , Laura Jacques  3 , Jenny A Higgins  3
Affiliations

'The Biggest Problem With Access': Provider Reports of the Effects of Wisconsin 2011 Act 217 Medication Abortion Legislation

Taryn M Valley et al. WMJ. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Abortion legislation in the United States determines people's access to services, including the abortion modality of their choice. In 2012, Wisconsin legislators passed Act 217, banning telemedicine for medication abortion and requiring the same physician to be physically present when patients signed state-mandated abortion consent forms and to administer abortion medications over 24 hours later.

Objective: No research documented real-time outcomes of 2011 Act 217 in Wisconsin; this study documents providers' descriptions of the effects of Wisconsin abortion regulations on providers, patients, and abortion care in the state.

Methods: We interviewed 22 Wisconsin abortion care providers (18 physicians and 4 staff members) about how Act 217 affected abortion provision. We coded transcripts using a combined deductive and inductive approach, then identified themes about how this legislation affects patients and providers.

Results: Providers interviewed universally reported that Act 217 negatively affected abortion care, with the same-physician requirement especially increasing risk to patients and demoralizing providers. Interviewees emphasized the lack of medical need for this legislation and explained that Act 217 and the previously enacted 24-hour waiting period worked synergistically to decrease access to medication abortion, disproportionately affecting rural and low-income Wisconsinites. Finally, providers felt Wisconsin's legislative ban on telemedicine medication abortion should be lifted.

Conclusion: Wisconsin abortion providers interviewed underscored how Act 217, alongside previous regulations, limited medication abortion access in the state. This evidence helps build a case for the harmful effects of non-evidence-based abortion restrictions, which is crucial considering recent deferral to state law after the fall of Roe v Wade in 2022.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Locations of Clinics That Provided Abortion Services in Wisconsin, 2019
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Mello K, Smith MH, Hill BJ, et al. Federal, state, and institutional barriers to the expansion of medication and telemedicine abortion services in Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contraception 2021;104(1):111–116. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grossman D, White K, Hopkins K, Potter JE. Change in Distance to Nearest Facility and Abortion in Texas, 2012 to 2014. JAMA 2017;317(4):437–439. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kohn JE, Snow JL, Simons HR, Seymour JW, Thompson TA, Grossman D. Medication Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine in Four U.S. States. Obstet Gynecol 2019;134(2):343–350. - PubMed
    1. Jones RK, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46(1):3–14. - PubMed
    1. Costescu D, Guilbert E, Bernardin J, et al. Medical Abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016;38(4):366–389. - PubMed