Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;83(6):469-477.
doi: 10.1007/s40265-023-01852-1. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Weight Loss Versus Glycemic Control as the Primary Treatment Target in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Why Choose When You Can Have Both?

Affiliations

Weight Loss Versus Glycemic Control as the Primary Treatment Target in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Why Choose When You Can Have Both?

Theocharis Koufakis et al. Drugs. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Weight loss has been associated with significant improvements in glycemic control, quality of life, and comorbidities in people with type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, achieving diabetes remission can reduce the risk of microvascular complications and mitigate the burden of diabetes on healthcare systems. However, preventing weight regain is challenging in the long term. Strict glycemic control, particularly in the early stages of the disease, can reduce the subsequent risk of microvascular complications and specific macrovascular endpoints in the long run; however, its impact on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality remains controversial. New classes of antidiabetic agents, namely glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, have been shown to reduce cardiorenal risk and induce weight loss, in addition to effectively lowering blood glucose with a minimal risk of hypoglycemia. Recently, it has been debated whether weight loss or glycemic control should be the first priority in people with a recent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. This article aims to discuss the debate from a clinical perspective, evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each therapeutic strategy, and assess the impact of both approaches on the future risk of diabetic complications, based on the latest evidence. Given that both goals are equally important, the authors suggest that merging the two strategies, with the early and aggressive use of combination therapies consisting of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, will confer maximum benefits in terms of weight loss and glycemic control, and will reduce the future risk of complications from diabetes. A personalized approach that takes into account specific patient characteristics, including age, sex, race, frailty, and cognitive status, among others, can lead to more effective diabetes care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157: 107843. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Clifton PM, Keogh JB. Effects of different weight loss approaches on CVD risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018;20:27. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Ryan DH, Yockey SR. Weight loss and improvement in comorbidity: differences at 5%, 10%, 15%, and over. Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6:187–94. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Shibib L, Al-Qaisi M, Ahmed A, et al. Reversal and remission of T2DM: an update for practitioners. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022;18:417–43. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Giorgino F, Leonardini A, Laviola L. Cardiovascular disease and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: now that the dust is settling from large clinical trials. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1281:36–50. - PubMed - PMC - DOI

LinkOut - more resources