Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 20;21(1):23.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00803-x.

Evidence for continuing professional development standards for regulated health practitioners in Australia: a systematic review

Penelope Ann Elizabeth Main  1 , Sarah Anderson  2   3
Affiliations

Evidence for continuing professional development standards for regulated health practitioners in Australia: a systematic review

Penelope Ann Elizabeth Main et al. Hum Resour Health. .

Abstract

Background: Health practitioner regulators throughout the world use continuing professional development (CPD) standards to ensure that registrants maintain, improve and broaden their knowledge, expertise and competence. As the CPD standard for most regulated health professions in Australia are currently under review, it is timely that an appraisal of the evidence be undertaken.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using major databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL), search engines and grey literature for evidence published between 2015 and April 2022. Publications included in the review were assessed against the relevant CASP checklist for quantitative studies and the McMaster University checklist for qualitative studies.

Results: The search yielded 87 abstracts of which 37 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. The evidence showed that mandatory CPD requirements are a strong motivational factor for their completion and improves practitioners' knowledge and behaviour. CPD that is more interactive is most effective and e-learning is as effective as face-to-face CPD. There is no direct evidence to suggest the optimal quantity of CPD, although there was some evidence that complex or infrequently used skills deteriorate between 4 months to a year after training, depending on the task.

Conclusions: CPD is most effective when it is interactive, uses a variety of methods and is delivered in a sequence involving multiple exposures over a period of time that is focused on outcomes considered important by practitioners. Although there is no optimal quantity of CPD, there is evidence that complex skills may require more frequent CPD.

Keywords: Continuing education; Continuing professional development; Health practitioners; Regulatory standards; Systematic review; e-learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flowchart of studies included in the systematic review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. European Commission . Study concerning the review and mapping of continuous professional development and lifelong learning for health professionals in the EU. Brussels: European Commission; 2015.
    1. Robertson MK, Umble KE, Cervero RM. Impact studies in continuing education for health professions: update. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2003;23:S6–S9. - PubMed
    1. Association of American Medical Colleges . Lifelong learning in medicine and nursing: final conference report. Washington: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2010.
    1. Institute of Medicine . Redesigning continuing education in the health professions. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2010. - PubMed
    1. Reid J. Certificationizing continuing education. Radiol Technol. 2015;86(3):338–340. - PubMed

Publication types