Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 20;11(1):54.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01497-y.

Synthetic bacterial consortia transplantation for the treatment of Gardnerella vaginalis-induced bacterial vaginosis in mice

Affiliations

Synthetic bacterial consortia transplantation for the treatment of Gardnerella vaginalis-induced bacterial vaginosis in mice

Yunxia Li et al. Microbiome. .

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a disease caused by vaginal microbiota dysbiosis. Here, we propose the use of synthetic bacterial consortia transplantation (SBCT) for the treatment of Gardnerella vaginalis-induced BV mice. The results showed that SBCT significantly reduced vaginal tissue damage and restored the vaginal microbiota, decreased the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-8), and suppressed NF-κB activation. IL-17, iNOS, and COX-2 expression in vaginal tissue were also down-regulated. However, IL-10 and Foxp3 showed up-regulated expression in mice. Compared with vaginal microbiota transplantation (VMT), results indicated that VMT was more effective than SBCT in suppressing G. vaginalis-induced inflammation. The obtained results suggest that synthetic bacterial consortia might be used as a potential biotherapeutic agent for the treatment of G. vaginalis-induced bacterial vaginosis. Video Abstract.

Keywords: Bacterial vaginosis; Lactic acid bacteria; Synthetic bacterial consortia transplantation; Vaginal microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The bacterial burdens in vaginal lavage fluids were assessed longitudinally on days 4, 6, 8, and 21; results are shown as means ± standard error of the mean
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Tissues were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and sections were evaluated by a Pannoramic MIDI digital section scanner. a CON, normal control mice. b GVI, GV-infected mice. c SBCT, synthetic bacterial consortia treatment for mice. d VMT, vaginal microbiota transplantation treatment for mice, magnification × 100
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Levels of IL-1β, IL-8, and IL-10 in the serum of mice in different groups. a IL-1β, interleukin-1β. b IL-8, interleukin-8. c IL-10, interleukin-10. Results are shown as means ± standard error of mean. *P < 0.05 vs. GVI group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Expression of TNF-α, iNOS and COX-2 genes in the vaginal tissues of mice. Data are presented as the means ± standard error of mean obtained from three independent experiments. a TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α. b iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase. c COX-2, cyclooxygenase 2. #P < 0.05 vs. normal control group; *P < 0.05 vs. GVI group
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Expression of helper T cell transcription factors in the vaginas of mice. a IL-17, interleukin-17. b FOXP3, Forkhead Box Protein P3. Data are presented as the means ± standard error of the mean of three independent experiments. #P < 0.05 vs. normal control group; *P < 0.05 vs. GVI group
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Evaluation of the vaginal microbiota in mice with vaginal microbiota dysbiosis using high-throughput sequencing: a Chao 1 index; b Shannon index; c Scalar Venn representation
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of the dissimilarity between the microbial samples: a CON and GVI group; b SBCT and GVI group; c VMT and GVI group
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Comparison of the relative abundance at genus level by LEfSe analysis: a CON and GVI groups; b SBCT and GVI groups; c VMT and GVI groups
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
The relative abundance of the dominant bacteria of the vaginal microbiome at the genus level. *P < 0.05 vs. GVI group
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Clusters of orthologous groups (COG)-predicted functional classification with different treatments. a CON and GVI groups. b SBCT and GVI groups;. c VMT and GVI groups
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Experimental scheme for the treatment of vaginal dysbiosis by synthetic bacterial consortia transplantation and vaginal microbiota transplantation

References

    1. Abou Chacra L, Fenollar F, Diop K. Bacterial vaginosis: what do we currently know? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;11:672429. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.672429. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babu G, Singaravelu BG, Srikumar R, Reddy SV, Kokan A. Comparative study on the vaginal flora and incidence of asymptomatic vaginosis among healthy women and in women with infertility problems of reproductive age. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):DC18–DC22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bilardi JE, Walker S, Temple-Smith M, et al. The burden of bacterial vaginosis: women's experience of the physical, emotional, sexual and social impact of living with recurrent bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074378. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen T, Xia C, Hu H, et al. Dysbiosis of the rat vagina is efficiently rescued by vaginal microbiota transplantation or probiotic combination. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021;57(3):106277. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106277. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen R, Li R, Qing W, et al. Probiotics are a good choice for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01449-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources