Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 19;21(1):e128372.
doi: 10.5812/ijpr-128372. eCollection 2022 Dec.

Comparison of Portable and Benchtop Near-Infrared Spectrometers for the Detection of Citric Acid-adulterated Lime Juice: A Chemometrics Approach

Affiliations

Comparison of Portable and Benchtop Near-Infrared Spectrometers for the Detection of Citric Acid-adulterated Lime Juice: A Chemometrics Approach

Reza Jahani et al. Iran J Pharm Res. .

Abstract

Background: Since the incidence of food adulteration is rising, finding a rapid, accurate, precise, low-cost, user-friendly, high-throughput, ruggedized, and ideally portable method is valuable to combat food fraud. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), in combination with a chemometrics-based approach, allows potentially rapid, frequent, and in situ measurements in supply chains.

Methods: This study focused on the feasibility of a benchtop Fourier-transformation-NIRS apparatus (FT-NIRS, 1000 - 2500 nm) and a portable short wave NIRS device (SW-NIRS, 740 - 1070 nm) for the discrimination of genuine and citric acid-adulterated lime juice samples in a cost-effective manner following chemometrics study.

Results: Principal component analysis (PCA) of the spectral data resulted in a noticeable distinction between genuine and adulterated samples. Wavelengths between 1100 - 1400 nm and ‎‎1550 - 1900 nm were found to be more important for the discrimination of samples for the benchtop FT-NIRS data, while variables between 950 - 1050 nm contributed significantly to the discrimination of samples based on the portable SW-NIRS data. Following partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) as a discriminant model, standard normal variate (SNV) or multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) transformation of benchtop FT-NIRS data and SNV in combination with the second derivative transformation of portable SW-NIRS data on the training set delivered equal accuracy (94%) in the prediction of the test set. In the soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) as a class-modeling approach, the overall performances of generated models on the auto-scaled data were 98% and 94.5% for benchtop FT-NIRS and portable SW-NIRS, respectively.

Conclusions: As a proof of concept, NIRS technology coupled with appropriate ‎multivariate classification models enables fast detection of citric acid-adulterated ‎lime juices. In addition, the promising results of portable SW-NIRS combined with SIMCA indicated its use as a screening tool for on-site analysis of lime juices at various stages of the food supply chain.

Keywords: Adulteration; Benchtop FT-NIR, Lime Juice; Chemometrics; Citric Acid; Portable SW-NIR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests: The authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. The median NIR spectra (solid lines) and the range between minimum and maximum intensity (shaded areas) obtained from lime juice samples in the benchtop FT-NIRS (boxed areas are excluded from further evaluation) (A); and portable SW-NIRS (B); SNV transformed spectra of the samples acquired in benchtop FT-NIRS (C); SNV in combination with second derivative transformed spectra of the samples acquired in portable SW-NIRS (D). FT-NIRS, Fourier-transformation near-infrared‎ spectroscopy; SW-NIRS, short wave near-infrared‎ spectroscopy; SNV, standard normal variate.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Principal component analysis score plot of genuine and adulterated samples with PC1, PC2, and PC3 based on the data obtained from benchtop FT-NIRS (A); and portable SW-NIRS (B). Outliers were excluded from the plots. PC, principal component; FT-NIRS, Fourier-transformation near-Infrared‎ spectroscopy; SW-NIRS, short wave near-infrared‎ spectroscopy.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. The ROC plot of the generated models based on the benchtop FT-NIRS (A); and portable SW-NIRS (B) data. ROC, receiver operator characteristic; FT-NIRS, Fourier-transformation near-infrared‎ spectroscopy; SW-NIRS, short wave near-infrared spectroscopy; C, calibration; CV, cross-validation.

References

    1. Manning L, Soon JM. Food Safety, Food Fraud, and Food Defense: A Fast Evolving Literature. J Food Sci. 2016;81(4):R823–34. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13256. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Everstine K, Spink J, Kennedy S. Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents. J Food Prot. 2013;76(4):723–35. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-399. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavin C, Cottenet G, Blancpain C, Bessaire T, Frank N, Zbinden P. Food Adulteration: From Vulnerability Assessment to New Analytical Solutions. Chimia (Aarau). 2016;70(5):329–33. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2016.329. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang M, Qiao H, Wang X, Pu MZ, Yu ZJ, Zheng FT. The third-party regulation on food safety in China: A review. J Integr Agric. 2015;14(11):2176–88. doi: 10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61114-5. - DOI
    1. Yang Y, Huisman W, Hettinga KA, Zhang L, van Ruth SM. The Chinese milk supply chain: A fraud perspective. Food Control. 2020;113:107211. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107211. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources