Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 4;12(7):e028424.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028424. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Use of Nonrecommended Drugs in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

Affiliations

Use of Nonrecommended Drugs in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

Camilla H B Jespersen et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) are recommended to avoid drugs that may increase their risk of arrhythmic events. We examined treatment with such drugs in patients with BrS after their diagnosis. Methods and Results All Danish patients diagnosed with BrS (2006-2018) with >12 months of follow-up were identified from nationwide registries. Nonrecommended BrS drugs were grouped into drugs to "avoid" or "preferably avoid" according to http://www.brugadadrugs.org. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to identify factors associated with any nonrecommended BrS drug use, and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associated risk of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, mortality, and a combined end point indicating an arrhythmic event of delayed implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, and mortality. During a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 93/270 (34.4%) patients with BrS (70.4% male, median age at diagnosis 46.1 years [interquartile range, 32.6-57.4]) were treated with ≥1 nonrecommended BrS drugs. No difference in any nonrecommended BrS drug use was identified comparing time before BrS diagnosis (12.6%) with each of the 5 years following BrS diagnosis (P>0.05). Factors associated with any nonrecommended BrS drug use after diagnosis were female sex (hazard ratio [HR]) 1.83 [95% CI, 1.15-2.90]), psychiatric disease (HR, 3.63 [1.89-6.99]), and prior use of any nonrecommended BrS drug (HR, 4.76 [2.45-9.25]). No significant association between any nonrecommended BrS drug use and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy (n=20/97, odds ratio [OR], 0.7 [0.2-2.4]), mortality (n=10/270, OR, 3.4 [0.7-19.6]), or the combined end point (n=38/270, OR, 1.7 [0.8-3.7]) was identified. Conclusions One in 3 patients with BrS were treated with a nonrecommended BrS drug after BrS diagnosis, and a BrS diagnosis did not change prescription patterns. More awareness of nonrecommended drug use among patients with BrS is needed.

Keywords: BrS; adverse drug events; pharmacotherapy; ventricular arrhythmia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proportion of patients with BrS in treatment with nonrecommended drugs before and after time of BrS diagnosis.
BrS indicates Brugada syndrome.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Factors associated with any nonrecommended BrS drug use after diagnosis.
Cox proportional hazards model additionally adjusted for year of diagnosis. ACA indicates aborted cardiac arrest; BrS, Brugada syndrome; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; and VT, ventricular tachycardia.

References

    1. Lahrouchi N, Raju H, Lodder EM, Papatheodorou E, Ware JS, Papadakis M, Tadros R, Cole D, Skinner JR, Crawford J, et al. Utility of post‐mortem genetic testing in cases of sudden arrhythmic death syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2134–2145. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.046 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Werf C, Hofman N, Tan HL, van Dessel PF, Alders M, van der Wal AC, van Langen IM, Wilde AA. Diagnostic yield in sudden unexplained death and aborted cardiac arrest in the young: the experience of a tertiary referral center in The Netherlands. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:1383–1389. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt‐Hansen J, de Riva M, Winkel BG, Behr ER, Blom NA, Charron P, Corrado D, Dagres N, de Chillou C, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:3997–4126. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Almeida Fernandes D, António N, Madeira M, Sousa P, Ventura M, Cristóvão J, Nascimento J, Elvas L, Gonçalves L, Pego GM. Unsafe drug use and arrhythmic events in Brugada patients with ICD: results of a long‐term follow‐up. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018;32:23–28. doi: 10.1007/s10557-018-6770-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types