The importance of follicular flushing in optimizing oocyte retrieval
- PMID: 36943690
- DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000870
The importance of follicular flushing in optimizing oocyte retrieval
Abstract
Purpose of review: To critically evaluate the use of follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval.
Recent findings: The latest meta-analysis evaluating follicular flushing does not favour its use over single aspiration. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included, however, are characterized by significant heterogeneity regarding the population analysed, the needle type and lumen used, the aspiration pressure applied and the number of flushing attempts performed. More importantly, information regarding the flow rate used for aspiration is scarce. The only RCT employing a constant flow rate between single aspiration and follicular flushing in women with monofollicular development, suggests that a higher number of oocytes is retrieved after follicular flushing.
Summary: In order to eliminate clinical heterogeneity that might obscure the detection of the true effect of follicular flushing, randomization to single aspiration and follicular flushing should occur within the same patient. This can be achieved by randomly allocating each patient's ovary to either single aspiration or follicular flushing, maintaining similar flow rates between the groups compared.Given the importance of maximizing the number of oocytes retrieved from a given number of follicles developed, the conduction of properly designed RCTs evaluating follicular flushing is certainly required.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Follicular flushing increases the number of oocytes retrieved: a randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod. 2023 Oct 3;38(10):1927-1937. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead169. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 37632249 Clinical Trial.
-
Follicular flushing leads to higher oocyte yield in monofollicular IVF: a randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct 1;35(10):2253-2261. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa165. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32856073 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Follicular flushing using double lumen needle yields more oocytes in mono-follicular poor responders.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Nov;50(9):102150. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102150. Epub 2021 Apr 16. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 33872815
-
Does follicular flushing increase oocyte number in poor responders? An update of a systematic review.Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Feb;46(2):289-294. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.11.011. Epub 2022 Nov 22. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023. PMID: 36566145
-
Follicle flushing does not improve live birth and increases procedure time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Fertil Steril. 2021 Apr;115(4):974-983. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.10.064. Epub 2021 Mar 3. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33676753
References
-
- Devesa M, Tur R, Rodríguez I, et al. Cumulative live birth rates and number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced age. A single centre analysis including 4500 women ≥38 years old. Hum Reprod 2018; 33:2010–2017.
-
- Drakopoulos P, Errázuriz J, Santos-Ribeiro S, et al. Cumulative live birth rates in in-vitro fertilization. Minerva Ginecol 2019; 71:207–210.
-
- Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, et al. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including -15,000 women. Fertil Steril 2018; 110:661–670.e1.
-
- Fanton M, Cho JH, Baker VL, Loewke K. A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in 2PNs, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth rates. Fertil Steril 2023.
-
- Tan SL, Waterstone J, Wren M, Parsons J. A prospective randomized study comparing aspiration only with aspiration and flushing for transvaginal ultrasound-directed oocyte recovery. Fertil Steril 1992; 58:356–360.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials