Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 4;57(13):5180-5189.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00620. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Demographic Determinants of Residue Profiles of Fungicidal Compounds in Common Voles (Microtus arvalis) under Semi-Natural and Natural Conditions

Affiliations

Demographic Determinants of Residue Profiles of Fungicidal Compounds in Common Voles (Microtus arvalis) under Semi-Natural and Natural Conditions

Christian Imholt et al. Environ Sci Technol. .

Abstract

Environmental risks from plant protection products (PPPs) need to be assessed to ensure safe use. The risk assessments are generally carried out using the common vole as a focal species with conservative theoretical estimates of external exposure. These are then compared to dose-related toxicity endpoints established in toxicity studies, often with laboratory species. The aim of the present study was to determine the actual internal dosimetry of PPPs' active ingredients (AIs) in a population of common voles to provide the basis for informed higher tier risk assessment. As a proof of concept, two fungicidal AIs (fludioxonil and cyprodinil) were investigated using a range of application methodologies. Individuals were treated using oral gavage application (AI dose: 100/200 mg/kg) and fed treated grass (AI sprayed at 2 kg/ha) under laboratory, semi-natural, and natural conditions. Our results show that demographic factors play a significant role in the individual residue profile and that age structure is a key aspect that determines the overall exposure risk of a population. These results are consistent from laboratory to field conditions. Future approaches could establish dose-residue relationships that are reflective of natural food intake rates in wild common vole populations in the risk assessment of PPPs.

Keywords: generic focal species; registration; risk assessment; toxicokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical representation of the effect of individual body weight on grass consumption. The y-axis represents the multiples of individual body weight that were consumed per day. Study data means are presented by a solid line. Predicted values, not covered by original data set, for heavier individuals are presented by a dashed line.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Periodogram of vole activity displaying the frequency (in hours) of above-ground activity in all four enclosures as well as their mean value. Spectral density on the y-axis represents the dimensionless signal strength, here above-ground vole activity, in relation to the frequency.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Single factor effects of time on individual AI residues (A,C cyprodinil; B,D fludioxonil) from different application methodologies (A,B oral gavage; C,D grass feeding) as a result of generalized linear mixed modeling. Differences in the temporal scale of model projections reflect different trial lengths.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Single factor effects of individual weight on AI residues (A cyprodinil; B fludioxonil) from different application methodologies as a result of generalized linear mixed modeling. Differences in the temporal scale of model projections reflect different weight distributions within the population.

References

    1. Pesticide Residues in Food - 2002: Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues: Rome, 16–25 September 2002; FAO, Weltgesundheitsorganisation, Eds.; FAO plant production and protection paper; World Health Organization [u.a.]: Genève, 2002.
    1. EU. Commission Regulation (EU) No 284/2013 of 1 March 2013 Setting out the Data Requirements for Plant Protection Products, in Accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Placing of Plant Protection Products on the MarketText with EEA Relevance, 2013, 68.
    1. Barnthouse L. W. Quantifying Population Recovery Rates for Ecological Risk Assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 500–508. 10.1897/02-521. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dickerson R. L.; Hooper M. J.; Gard N. W.; Cobb G. P.; Kendall R. J. Toxicological Foundations of Ecological Risk Assessment: Biomarker Development and Interpretation Based on Laboratory and Wildlife Species. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994, 102, 65–69. 10.1289/ehp.94102s1265a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on Request from EFSA. EFSA J. 2009, 7, 1438.10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438. - DOI

Publication types